llvm-project.git/llvm/test/TableGen/SchedModelError.td, branch users/nico/python-2 Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository. [TableGen] Track reference locations of Records/RecordVals 2022-09-28T06:48:16+00:00 River Riddle riddleriver@gmail.com 2022-09-16T22:06:51+00:00 50d96f59d0966bdda6b3ac4f8964ed572435b847 This is extremely useful for language tooling as it allows for providing go-to-def/find-references/etc. for many more situations than what is currently possible. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134087 
This is extremely useful for language tooling as it allows
for providing go-to-def/find-references/etc. for many
more situations than what is currently possible.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134087
[TableGen] Include schedule model name in diagnostic. 2019-04-15T10:06:26+00:00 Simon Tatham simon.tatham@arm.com 2019-04-15T10:06:26+00:00 301ed1cb49abe9dda2cbc35281821e268e6d070d If you have more than one schedule model in your TableGen target definitions, then the diagnostic "No schedule information for instruction 'foo'" is rather unhelpful, because it doesn't tell you _which_ schedule model is missing the necessary information (or, as it might be, missing the UnsupportedFeatures definition that would stop it thinking it needed it). Extended the message to include the name of the schedule model that it's complaining about. Reviewers: nhaehnle, hfinkel, javedabsar, efriedma, javed.absar Reviewed By: javed.absar Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60559 llvm-svn: 358389 
If you have more than one schedule model in your TableGen target
definitions, then the diagnostic "No schedule information for
instruction 'foo'" is rather unhelpful, because it doesn't tell you
_which_ schedule model is missing the necessary information (or, as it
might be, missing the UnsupportedFeatures definition that would stop
it thinking it needed it).

Extended the message to include the name of the schedule model that
it's complaining about.

Reviewers: nhaehnle, hfinkel, javedabsar, efriedma, javed.absar

Reviewed By: javed.absar

Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60559

llvm-svn: 358389