Since e39f6c1844fab59c638d8059a6cf139adb42279a opt will infer the
correct datalayout when given a triple. Avoid explicitly specifying it
in tests that depend on the AMDGPU target being present to avoid the
string becoming out of sync with the TargetInfo value.
Only tests with REQUIRES: amdgpu-registered-target or a local lit.cfg
were updated to ensure that tests for non-target-specific passes that
happen to use the AMDGPU layout still pass when building with a limited
set of targets.

Reviewed By: shiltian, arsenm

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137921

Similar to 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449.

For IR files without a target triple, -mtriple= specifies the full
target triple while -march= merely sets the architecture part of the
default target triple, leaving a target triple which may not make sense,
e.g. amdgpu-apple-darwin.

Therefore, -march= is error-prone and not recommended for tests without
a target triple. The issue has been benign as we recognize
$unknown-apple-darwin as ELF instead of rejecting it outrightly.

This patch changes AMDGPU tests to not rely on the default
OS/environment components. Tests that need fixes are not changed:

```
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.f64.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/floor.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.f64.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/r600-infinite-loop-bug-while-reorganizing-vector.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/schedule-if-2.ll
```

Re-land D145441 with data layout upgrade code fixed to not break OpenMP.

This reverts commit 3f2fbe92d0f40bcb46db7636db9ec3f7e7899b27.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149776

This reverts commit f9c1ede2543b37fabe9f2d8f8fed5073c475d850.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149758

Per discussion at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/representing-buffer-descriptors-in-the-amdgpu-target-call-for-suggestions/68798,
we define two new address spaces for AMDGCN targets.

The first is address space 7, a non-integral address space (which was
already in the data layout) that has 160-bit pointers (which are
256-bit aligned) and uses a 32-bit offset. These pointers combine a
128-bit buffer descriptor and a 32-bit offset, and will be usable with
normal LLVM operations (load, store, GEP). However, they will be
rewritten out of existence before code generation.

The second of these is address space 8, the address space for "buffer
resources". These will be used to represent the resource arguments to
buffer instructions, and new buffer intrinsics will be defined that
take them instead of <4 x i32> as resource arguments. ptr
addrspace(8). These pointers are 128-bits long (with the same
alignment). They must not be used as the arguments to getelementptr or
otherwise used in address computations, since they can have
arbitrarily complex inherent addressing semantics that can't be
represented in LLVM. Even though, like their address space 7 cousins,
these pointers have deterministic ptrtoint/inttoptr semantics, they
are defined to be non-integral in order to prevent optimizations that
rely on pointers being a [0, [addr_max]] value from applying to them.

Future work includes:
- Defining new buffer intrinsics that take ptr addrspace(8) resources.
- A late rewrite to turn address space 7 operations into buffer
intrinsics and offset computations.

This commit also updates the "fallback address space" for buffer
intrinsics to the buffer resource, and updates the alias analysis
table.

Depends on D143437

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145441

Over the past day or so, i've took a large swing at our tests,
and reduced the number of tests that were still using the old syntax
from ~1800 to just 200.

Left to handle: (as it is seen in this patch)
* Transforms/LSR
* Transforms/CGP
* Transforms/TypePromotion
* Transforms/HardwareLoops
* Analysis/*
* some misc.

I think this is the right point to start actively refusing
to honor the old syntax, except for the old tests,
to prevent the old syntax from creeping back in.

Thus, let's add temporary default-off flag,
and if it is not passed refuse to accept old syntax.
The tests that still need porting are annotated with this flag.

Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139647

Tests relying on this should explicitly use -passes='require<analysis>,foo'.

Follow-up to D82607
Revert an accidental change (empty.ll) of D82683