llvm-project.git/llvm/test/Bitcode/invalid.test, branch main Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository. [Bitcode] Verify types for aggregate initializers 2024-11-28T10:21:38+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2024-11-28T10:15:32+00:00 98204a2e5bb754b0260175e42614c5463807beb5 Unfortunately all the nice error messages get lost because we don't forward errors from lazy value materialization. Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/117707. 
Unfortunately all the nice error messages get lost because we
don't forward errors from lazy value materialization.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/117707.
[llvm] Remove explicit -opaque-pointers flag from tests (NFC) 2023-07-12T12:35:55+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2023-07-12T12:19:34+00:00 edb2fc6dab2cf04779959829434e9e8572d48a26 Opaque pointers mode is enabled by default, no need to explicitly enable it. 
Opaque pointers mode is enabled by default, no need to explicitly
enable it.
[HWASAN][LSAN] Disable tests which don't pass in HWASAN+LSAN mode 2023-03-10T00:51:55+00:00 Kirill Stoimenov kstoimenov@google.com 2023-03-06T23:55:32+00:00 011b4d4706eea722d63438892afefdb8152b7b62 Reviewed By: vitalybuka Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145727 
Reviewed By: vitalybuka

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145727
[Bitcode] Remove auto-detection for typed pointers 2022-12-14T12:38:20+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2022-12-13T10:58:06+00:00 e45cf479231fc144b4e1eb8b3e3bd2f578b6907d Always read bitcode according to the -opaque-pointers mode. Do not perform auto-detection to implicitly switch to typed pointers. This is a step towards removing typed pointer support, and also eliminates the class of problems where linking may fail if a typed pointer module is loaded before an opaque pointer module. (The latest place where this was encountered is D139924, but this has previously been fixed in other places doing bitcode linking as well.) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139940 
Always read bitcode according to the -opaque-pointers mode. Do not
perform auto-detection to implicitly switch to typed pointers.

This is a step towards removing typed pointer support, and also
eliminates the class of problems where linking may fail if a typed
pointer module is loaded before an opaque pointer module. (The
latest place where this was encountered is D139924, but this has
previously been fixed in other places doing bitcode linking as well.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139940
[Bitcode] Don't confuse type attributes on declaration and call 2022-03-11T16:32:40+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2022-03-11T16:30:34+00:00 2182665305d90ae7d0d2b573dced9ef0ef414a9a We should not be using APIs here that try to fetch the attribute from both the call attributes and the function attributes. Otherwise we'll try to upgrade a non-existent sret attribute on the call using the attribute on the function. 
We should not be using APIs here that try to fetch the attribute
from both the call attributes and the function attributes. Otherwise
we'll try to upgrade a non-existent sret attribute on the call using
the attribute on the function.
[Bitcode] Check for type mismatch when assigning value 2022-03-11T11:12:54+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2022-03-11T11:10:00+00:00 cda82d39f3f25d8f6d1c1a105a59001339e54bb2 If the value is forward-declared, then the type must match, otherwise we can't RAUW. 
If the value is forward-declared, then the type must match,
otherwise we can't RAUW.
[Bitcode] Report error for missing element type for attr upgrade 2022-03-11T09:18:42+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2022-03-11T09:17:31+00:00 e732f69ea1fdca2c4c0c56600e03f0d8d82e1c29 Otherwise this is going to crash either the TypeFinder or the Verifier. 
Otherwise this is going to crash either the TypeFinder or the
Verifier.
[Bitstream] Improve error propagation from ReadVBR 2022-02-16T01:12:38+00:00 Jan Korous jkorous@apple.com 2022-02-15T02:22:18+00:00 4a794d848ce81f41c6e23a4d3d3f70c2d7d1baa4 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119307 
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119307
[Bitcode] Fix size check for DIImportedEntity record 2022-02-09T13:23:30+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2022-02-09T13:19:24+00:00 ea93ca60efedb4419a123d328150334a566d167a This was using && instead of ||. 
This was using && instead of ||.
[Bitcode] Check minimum size of constant GEP record 2022-02-09T13:23:30+00:00 Nikita Popov npopov@redhat.com 2022-02-09T13:14:04+00:00 72248712e58b8825f2b0857bde4a811eb484ea82 Checking this early, because we may end up reading up to two records before the operands. 
Checking this early, because we may end up reading up to two
records before the operands.