Support comparison of ConstantRangeList attributes in
FunctionComparator.

Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

Similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96902, this adds
`getDataLayout()` helpers to Function and GlobalValue, replacing the
current `getParent()->getDataLayout()` pattern.

Remove support for the icmp and fcmp constant expressions.

This is part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179

As usual, many of the updated tests will no longer test what they were
originally intended to -- this is hard to preserve when constant
expressions get removed, and in many cases just impossible as the
existence of a specific kind of constant expression was the cause of the
issue in the first place.

This implements the `nusw` and `nuw` flags for `getelementptr` as
proposed at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-nusw-and-nuw-flags-for-getelementptr/78672.

The three possible flags are encapsulated in the new `GEPNoWrapFlags`
class. Currently this class has a ctor from bool, interpreted as the
InBounds flag. This ctor should be removed in the future, as code gets
migrated to handle all flags.

There are a few places annotated with `TODO(gep_nowrap)`, where I've had
to touch code but opted to not infer or precisely preserve the new
flags, so as to keep this as NFC as possible and make sure any changes
of that kind get test coverage when they are made.

Think that it can be good to reduce the number of copies created when
working with ConstantRangeAttributes.

It is possible to update
[AttributeImpl::operator<](https://github.com/andjo403/llvm-project/blob/a9da350aadfb5c86d36ae18398471558b22c1309/llvm/lib/IR/Attributes.cpp#L744)
instead but feels strange to say that a range is less then an other
range.

As part of the migration to ptradd
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-replacing-getelementptr-with-ptradd/68699),
we need to change the representation of the `inrange` attribute, which
is used for vtable splitting.

Currently, inrange is specified as follows:

```
getelementptr inbounds ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, inrange i32 1, i64 2)
```

The `inrange` is placed on a GEP index, and all accesses must be "in
range" of that index. The new representation is as follows:

```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) ({ [4 x ptr], [4 x ptr] }, ptr @vt, i64 0, i32 1, i64 2)
```

This specifies which offsets are "in range" of the GEP result. The new
representation will continue working when canonicalizing to ptradd
representation:

```
getelementptr inbounds inrange(-16, 16) (i8, ptr @vt, i64 48)
```

The inrange offsets are relative to the return value of the GEP. An
alternative design could make them relative to the source pointer
instead. The result-relative format was chosen on the off-chance that we
want to extend support to non-constant GEPs in the future, in which case
this variant is more expressive.

This implementation "upgrades" the old inrange representation in bitcode
by simply dropping it. This is a very niche feature, and I don't think
trying to upgrade it is worthwhile. Let me know if you disagree.

Functions using different constant expressions were incorrectly
merged, because a lot of state was missing from the comparison,
including the opcode, the comparison predicate, the GEP element
type, as well as the inbounds, inrange and nowrap poison flags.

Prior to this patch, differing metadata operands to two otherwise
identical instructions was not enough to consider the instructions
different in the eyes of the function comparator. This breaks LLVM
virtual function elimination, among other features.

In this patch, we handle the case where two associated operands are
MDStrings of different value. This patch does not differentiate more
complex metadata operands.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nuri Amari <nuriamari@fb.com>