Follow-up to #141333. Relocation generation called both addReloc and
applyFixup, with the default addReloc invoking shouldForceRelocation,
resulting in three virtual calls. This approach was also inflexible, as
targets needing additional data required extending
`shouldForceRelocation` (see #73721, resolved by #141311).

This change integrates relocation handling into applyFixup, eliminating
two virtual calls. The prior default addReloc is renamed to
maybeAddReloc. Targets overriding addReloc now call their customized
addReloc implementation.

None of these implicitly generate UNDEF/POISON

This PR resolves https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/144513

The modification include five pattern :
1.vselect Cond, 0, 0 → 0
2.vselect Cond, -1, 0 → bitcast Cond
3.vselect Cond, -1, x → or Cond, x
4.vselect Cond, x, 0 → and Cond, x
5.vselect Cond, 000..., X -> andn Cond, X

1-4 have been migrated to DAGCombine. 5 still in x86 code.

The reason is that you cannot use the andn instruction directly in
DAGCombine, you can only use and+xor, which will introduce optimization
order issues. For example, in the x86 backend, select Cond, 0, x →
(~Cond) & x, the backend will first check whether the cond node of
(~Cond) is a setcc node. If so, it will modify the comparison operator
of the condition.So the x86 backend cannot complete the optimization of
andn.In short, I think it is a better choice to keep the pattern of
vselect Cond, 000..., X instead of and+xor in combineDAG.

For commit, the first is code changes and x86 test(note 1), the second
is tests in other backend(node 2).

---------

Co-authored-by: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>

In most contexts the pointer type is implied by the operation
and should be propagated; getPointerTy is for niche cases where
there is a synthesized value.

Moved `Contents` and `Fixups` SmallVector storage to MCSection, enabling
trivial destructors for most fragment subclasses and eliminating the need
for MCFragment::destroy in ~MCSection.

For appending content to the current section, use
getContentsForAppending. During assembler relaxation, prefer
setContents/setFixups, which may involve copying and reduce the benefits
of https://reviews.llvm.org/D145791.

Moving only Contents out-of-line caused a slight performance regression
(Alexis Engelke's 2024 prototype). By also moving Fragments out-of-line,
fragment destructors become trivial, resulting in
neglgible instructions:u increase for "stage2-O0-g" and [large max-rss decrease](https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=84e82746c3ff63ec23a8b85e9efd4f7fccf92590&to=555a28c0b2f8250a9cf86fd267a04b0460283e15&stat=max-rss&linkStats=on)
for the "stage1-ReleaseLTO-g (link only)" benchmark.
(
An older version using fewer inline functions: https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=bb982e733cfcda7e4cfb0583544f68af65211ed1&to=f12d55f97c47717d438951ecddecf8ebd28c296b&linkStats=on
)

Now using plain SmallVector in MCSection for storage, with potential for
future allocator optimizations, such as allocating `Contents` as the
trailing object of MCDataFragment. (GNU Assembler uses gnulib's obstack
for fragment management.)

Co-authored-by: Alexis Engelke <engelke@in.tum.de>

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146307

We added LNLP sched model recently, PFM counter bounding names needs to
match cpu string.
llvm-exegesis wont produce results without correct naming.

Co-authored-by: mattarde <mattarde@intel.com>