The name is misleading, as setting Fragment to nullptr does not
necessarily make it undefined - common and equated symbols have
a nullptr fragment as well.

The object file format specific derived classes are used in context
where the type is statically known. We don't use isa/dyn_cast and we
want to eliminate MCSymbol::Kind in the base class.

This commit adds support for WebAssembly's custom-page-sizes proposal to
`wasm-ld`. An overview of the proposal can be found
[here](https://github.com/WebAssembly/custom-page-sizes/blob/main/proposals/custom-page-sizes/Overview.md).
In a sentence, it allows customizing a Wasm memory's page size, enabling
Wasm to target environments with less than 64KiB of memory (the default
Wasm page size) available for Wasm memories.

This commit contains the following:

* Adds a `--page-size=N` CLI flag to `wasm-ld` for configuring the
linked Wasm binary's linear memory's page size.

* When the page size is configured to a non-default value, then the
final Wasm binary will use the encodings defined in the
custom-page-sizes proposal to declare the linear memory's page size.

* Defines a `__wasm_first_page_end` symbol, whose address points to the
first page in the Wasm linear memory, a.k.a. is the Wasm memory's page
size. This allows writing code that is compatible with any page size,
and doesn't require re-compiling its object code. At the same time,
because it just lowers to a constant rather than a memory access or
something, it enables link-time optimization.

* Adds tests for these new features.

r? @sbc100 

cc @sunfishcode

This defines some new target features. These are subsets of existing
features that reflect implementation concerns:

- "call-indirect-overlong" - implied by "reference-types"; just the
overlong encoding for the `call_indirect` immediate, and not the actual
reference types.

- "bulk-memory-opt" - implied by "bulk-memory": just `memory.copy` and
`memory.fill`, and not the other instructions in the bulk-memory
proposal.

This is split out from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112035.

---------

Co-authored-by: Heejin Ahn <aheejin@gmail.com>

Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

This adds the basic assembly generation support for the final EH
proposal, which was newly adopted in Sep 2023 and advanced into Phase 4
in Jul 2024:

https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/main/proposals/exception-handling/Exceptions.md

This adds support for the generation of new `try_table` and `throw_ref`
instruction in .s asesmbly format. This does NOT yet include
- Block annotation comment generation for .s format
- .o object file generation
- .s assembly parsing
- Type checking (AsmTypeCheck)
- Disassembler
- Fixing unwind mismatches in CFGStackify

These will be added as follow-up PRs.

---

The format for `TRY_TABLE`, both for `MachineInstr` and `MCInst`, is as
follows:
```
TRY_TABLE type number_of_catches catch_clauses*
```
where `catch_clause` is
```
catch_opcode tag+ destination
```
`catch_opcode` should be one of 0/1/2/3, which denotes
`CATCH`/`CATCH_REF`/`CATCH_ALL`/`CATCH_ALL_REF` respectively. (See
`BinaryFormat/Wasm.h`) `tag` exists when the catch is one of `CATCH` or
`CATCH_REF`.
The MIR format is printed as just the list of raw operands. The
(stack-based) assembly instruction supports pretty-printing, including
printing `catch` clauses by name, in InstPrinter.

In addition to the new instructions `TRY_TABLE` and `THROW_REF`, this
adds four pseudo instructions: `CATCH`, `CATCH_REF`, `CATCH_ALL`, and
`CATCH_ALL_REF`. These are pseudo instructions to simulate block return
values of `catch`, `catch_ref`, `catch_all`, `catch_all_ref` clauses in
`try_table` respectively, given that we don't support block return
values except for one case (`fixEndsAtEndOfFunction` in CFGStackify).
These will be omitted when we lower the instructions to `MCInst` at the
end.

LateEHPrepare now will have one more stage to covert
`CATCH`/`CATCH_ALL`s to `CATCH_REF`/`CATCH_ALL_REF`s when there is a
`RETHROW` to rethrow its exception. The pass also converts `RETHROW`s
into `THROW_REF`. Note that we still use `RETHROW` as an interim pseudo
instruction until we convert them to `THROW_REF` in LateEHPrepare.

CFGStackify has a new `placeTryTableMarker` function, which places
`try_table`/`end_try_table` markers with a necessary `catch` clause and
also `block`/`end_block` markers for the destination of the `catch`
clause.

In MCInstLower, now we need to support one more case for the multivalue
block signature (`catch_ref`'s destination's `(i32, exnref)` return
type).

InstPrinter has a new routine to print the `catch_list` type, which is
used to print `try_table` instructions.

The new test, `exception.ll`'s source is the same as
`exception-legacy.ll`, with the FileCheck expectations changed. One
difference is the commands in this file have `-wasm-enable-exnref` to
test the new format, and don't have `-wasm-disable-explicit-locals
-wasm-keep-registers`, because the new custom InstPrinter routine to
print `catch_list` only works for the stack-based instructions (`_S`),
and we can't use `-wasm-keep-registers` for them.

As in `exception-legacy.ll`, the FileCheck lines for the new tests do
not contain the whole program; they mostly contain only the control flow
instructions for readability.

Follow up to #92042

This adds (back) the exnref type restored in the new EH proposal adopted
in Oct 2023 CG meeting:

https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/main/proposals/exception-handling/Exceptions.md:x

Multivalue feature of WebAssembly has been standardized for several
years now. I think it makes sense to be able to enable it in the feature
section by default for our clang/llvm-produced binaries so that the
multivalue feature can be used as necessary when necessary within our
toolchain and also when running other optimizers (e.g. wasm-opt) after
the LLVM code generation.

But some WebAssembly toolchains, such as Emscripten, do not provide both
mulvalue-returning and not-multivalue-returning versions of libraries.
Also allowing the uses of multivalue in the features section does not
necessarily mean we generate them whenever we can to the fullest, which
is a different code generation / optimization option.

So this makes the lowering of multivalue returns conditional on the use
of 'experimental-mv' target ABI. This ABI is turned off by default and
turned on by passing `-Xclang -target-abi -Xclang experimental-mv` to
`clang`, or `-target-abi experimental-mv` to `clang -cc1` or `llc`.

But the purpose of this PR is not tying the multivalue lowering to this
specific 'experimental-mv'. 'experimental-mv' is just one multivalue ABI
we currently have, and it is still experimental, meaning it is not very
well optimized or tuned for performance. (e.g. it does not have the
limitation of the max number of multivalue-lowered values, which can be
detrimental to performance.) We may change the name of this ABI, or
improve it, or add a new multivalue ABI in the future. Also I heard that
WASI is planning to add their multivalue ABI soon. So the plan is,
whenever any one of multivalue ABIs is enabled, we enable the lowering
of multivalue returns in the backend. We currently have only
'experimental-mv' in the repo so we only check for that in this PR.

Related past discussions:
 #82714
https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/pull/223#issuecomment-2008298652

LLVM models some features found in the binary format with raw integers
and others with nested or enumerated types. This PR switches modeling of
tables and segments to use wasm::ValType rather than uint32_t. This NFC
change is in preparation for modeling more reference types, but IMO is
also cleaner and closer to the spec.