The createSIMachineScheduler & createPostMachineScheduler
target hooks are currently placed in the PassConfig interface.
Moving it out to TargetMachine so that both legacy and
the new pass manager can effectively use them.

Following discussions in #110443, and the following earlier discussions
in https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/117907.html,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482, https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489, this
PR attempts to overhaul the `TargetMachine` and `LLVMTargetMachine`
interface classes. More specifically:
1. Makes `TargetMachine` the only class implemented under
`TargetMachine.h` in the `Target` library.
2. `TargetMachine` contains target-specific interface functions that
relate to IR/CodeGen/MC constructs, whereas before (at least on paper)
it was supposed to have only IR/MC constructs. Any Target that doesn't
want to use the independent code generator simply does not implement
them, and returns either `false` or `nullptr`.
3. Renames `LLVMTargetMachine` to `CodeGenCommonTMImpl`. This renaming
aims to make the purpose of `LLVMTargetMachine` clearer. Its interface
was moved under the CodeGen library, to further emphasis its usage in
Targets that use CodeGen directly.
4. Makes `TargetMachine` the only interface used across LLVM and its
projects. With these changes, `CodeGenCommonTMImpl` is simply a set of
shared function implementations of `TargetMachine`, and CodeGen users
don't need to static cast to `LLVMTargetMachine` every time they need a
CodeGen-specific feature of the `TargetMachine`.
5. More importantly, does not change any requirements regarding library
linking.

cc @arsenm @aeubanks

Make __builtin_cpu_{init|supports|is} target independent and provide an
opt-in query for targets that want to support it. Each target is still
responsible for their specific lowering/code-gen. Also provide code-gen
for PowerPC.

I originally proposed this in https://reviews.llvm.org/D152914 and this
addresses the comments I received there.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanjaivanovic@nemanjas-air.kpn>
Co-authored-by: Nemanja Ivanovic <nemanja@synopsys.com>

This will make it easy for callers to see issues with and fix up calls
to createTargetMachine after a future change to the params of
TargetMachine.

This matches other nearby enums.

For downstream users, this should be a fairly straightforward
replacement,
e.g. s/CodeGenOpt::Aggressive/CodeGenOptLevel::Aggressive
or s/CGFT_/CodeGenFileType::

This fixes what I consider to be an API flaw I've tripped over
multiple times. The point this is constructed isn't well defined, so
depending on where this is first called, you can conclude different
information based on the MachineFunction. For example, the AMDGPU
implementation inspected the MachineFrameInfo on construction for the
stack objects and if the frame has calls. This kind of worked in
SelectionDAG which visited all allocas up front, but broke in
GlobalISel which hasn't visited any of the IR when arguments are
lowered.

I've run into similar problems before with the MIR parser and trying
to make use of other MachineFunction fields, so I think it's best to
just categorically disallow dependency on the MachineFunction state in
the constructor and to always construct this at the same time as the
MachineFunction itself.

A missing feature I still could use is a way to access an custom
analysis pass on the IR here.

Seems like this can be const, since Passes shouldn't modify it.

Reviewed By: wsmoses

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120518

`asm` always has AT&T-style input (`asm inteldialect` has Intel-style asm
input), so EmitGCCInlineAsmStr() always has to pick the same variant since it
cares about the input asm string, not the output asm string.

For PowerPC, that default variant is 1. For other targets, it's 0.

Without this, the included test case errors out with

    error: unknown use of instruction mnemonic without a size suffix
             mov rax, rbx

since it picks the intel branch and then tries to interpret it as AT&T
when selecting intel-style output with `-x86-asm-syntax=intel`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113894

The TargetMachine uses the triple to determine endianness. Just
use that logic rather than replicating it in PPCSubtarget.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98674