Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best
to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into
inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in
Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to
get reliable results across targets.

Note: I don't have commit access.

Currently needsStackRealignment returns false if canRealignStack returns false.
This means that the behavior of needsStackRealignment does not correspond to
it's name and description; a function might need stack realignment, but if it
is not possible then this function returns false. Furthermore,
needsStackRealignment is not virtual and therefore some backends have made use
of canRealignStack to indicate whether a function needs stack realignment.

This patch attempts to clarify the situation by separating them and introducing
new names:

 - shouldRealignStack - true if there is any reason the stack should be
   realigned

 - canRealignStack - true if we are still able to realign the stack (e.g. we
   can still reserve/have reserved a frame pointer)

 - hasStackRealignment = shouldRealignStack && canRealignStack (not target
   customisable)

Targets can now override shouldRealignStack to indicate that stack realignment
is required.

This change will make it easier in a future change to handle the case where we
need to realign the stack but can't do so (for example when the register
allocator creates an aligned spill after the frame pointer has been
eliminated).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98716

Change-Id: Ib9a4d21728bf9d08a545b4365418d3ffe1af4d87

to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

MSA stores and loads to the stack are more likely to require an
emergency GPR spill slot due to the smaller offsets available
with those instructions.

Handle this by overestimating the size of the stack by determining
the largest offset presuming that all callee save registers are
spilled and accounting of incoming arguments when determining
whether an emergency spill slot is required.

Reviewers: atanasyan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39056

llvm-svn: 317204

1. RegisterClass::getSize() is split into two functions:
   - TargetRegisterInfo::getRegSizeInBits(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
   - TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillSize(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
2. RegisterClass::getAlignment() is replaced by:
   - TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillAlignment(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;

This will allow making those values depend on subtarget features in the
future.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31783

llvm-svn: 301221

getFrameInfo() never returns nullptr so we should use a reference
instead of a pointer.

llvm-svn: 277017

Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.

Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'

Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595

This will become necessary in a subsequent change to make this method
merge adjacent stack adjustments, i.e. it might erase the previous
and/or next instruction.

It also greatly simplifies the calls to this function from Prolog-
EpilogInserter. Previously, that had a bunch of logic to resume iteration
after the call; now it just continues with the returned iterator.

Note that this changes the behaviour of PEI a little. Previously,
it attempted to re-visit the new instruction created by
eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(). That code was added in r36625,
but I can't see any reason for it: the new instructions will obviously
not be pseudo instructions, they will not have FrameIndex operands,
and we have already accounted for the stack adjustment.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18627

llvm-svn: 265036

llvm-svn: 259655