Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

Replace it with a forward declaration instead. Analysis.h is pulled in
by all passes, but not all passes need to access the module.

The ELF code from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811 emits LDRLIT_ga_pcrel
when `TM.isPositionIndependent()` but uses a different condition
`Subtarget.isGVIndirectSymbol(GV)` (aka dso_preemptable on ELF targets).
This would cause incorrect access for dso_preemptable
`__stack_chk_guard` with the static relocation model.

Regarding whether `__stack_chk_guard` gets the dso_local specifier,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150841 switched to
`M.getDirectAccessExternalData()` (implied by "PIC Level") instead of
`TM.getRelocationModel() == Reloc::Static`.

The result is that when non-zero "PIC Level" is used with static
relocation model (e.g. -fPIE/-fPIC LTO compiles with -no-pie linking),
`__stack_chk_guard` accesses are incorrect.
```
        ldr     r0, .LCPI0_0
        ldr     r0, [r0]
        ldr     r0, [r0]   // incorrectly dereferences __stack_chk_guard
...
.LCPI0_0:
        .long   __stack_chk_guard
```

To fix this, for dso_preemptable `__stack_chk_guard`, emit a GOT PIC
code sequence like for -fpic using `LDRLIT_ga_pcrel`:
```
        ldr     r0, .LCPI0_0
.LPC0_0:
        add     r0, pc, r0
        ldr     r0, [r0]
        ldr     r0, [r0]
...
LCPI0_0:
.Ltmp0:
        .long   __stack_chk_guard(GOT_PREL)-((.LPC0_0+8)-.Ltmp0)
```

Technically, `LDRLIT_ga_abs` with `R_ARM_GOT_ABS` could be used, but
`R_ARM_GOT_ABS` does not have GNU or integrated assembler support.
(Note, `.LCPI0_0: .long __stack_chk_guard@GOT` produces an
`R_ARM_GOT_BREL`, which is not desired).

This patch fixes #6499 while not changing behavior for the following
configurations:
```
run arm.linux.nopic --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fno-pic
run arm.linux.pie --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fpie
run arm.linux.pic --target=arm-linux-gnueabi -fpic
run armv6.darwin.nopic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -fno-pic
run armv6.darwin.dynamicnopic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -mdynamic-no-pic
run armv6.darwin.pic --target=armv6-apple-darwin -fpic
run armv7.darwin.nopic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -fno-pic
run armv7.darwin.dynamicnopic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -mdynamic-no-pic
run armv7.darwin.pic --target=armv7-apple-darwin -mcpu=cortex-a8 -fpic
run arm64.darwin.pic --target=arm64-apple-darwin
```

Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.

This reverts commit fd4808887ee47f3ec8a030e9211169ef4fb094c3.

This patch causes gcc to issue a lot of warnings like:

  warning: base class ‘class llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand’ should be
  explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]

Identified with readability-redundant-member-init.

Implement support for loading the stack canary from a memory location held in
the TLS register, with an optional offset applied. This is used by the Linux
kernel to implement per-task stack canaries, which is impossible on SMP systems
when using a global variable for the stack canary.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112768

Currently, LOAD_STACK_GUARD on ARM is only implemented for Mach-O targets, and
other targets rely on the generic support which may result in spilling of the
stack canary value or address, or may cause it to be kept in a callee save
register across function calls, which means they essentially get spilled as
well, only by the callee when it wants to free up this register.

So let's implement LOAD_STACK GUARD for other targets as well. This ensures
that the load of the stack canary is rematerialized fully in the epilogue.

This code was split off from

  D112768: [ARM] implement support for TLS register based stack protector

for which it is a prerequisite.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112811

Prefer (self-documenting) return values to output parameters (which are
liable to be used).
While here, rename Noop to Nop which is more widely used and improves
consistency with hasEmitNops/setEmitNops/emitNop/etc.

Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77127