Remove support for the icmp and fcmp constant expressions.

This is part of:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-remove-most-constant-expressions/63179

As usual, many of the updated tests will no longer test what they were
originally intended to -- this is hard to preserve when constant
expressions get removed, and in many cases just impossible as the
existence of a specific kind of constant expression was the cause of the
issue in the first place.

These constant expressions no longer exist, so don't handle them.

Vectors are always bit-packed and don't respect the elements' alignment
requirements. This is different from arrays. This means offsets of
vector GEPs need to be computed differently than offsets of array GEPs.

This PR fixes many places that rely on an incorrect pattern
that always relies on `DL.getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType())`.
We replace these by usages of  `GTI.getSequentialElementStride(DL)`, 
which is a new helper function added in this PR.

This changes behavior for GEPs into vectors with element types for which
the (bit) size and alloc size is different. This includes two cases:

* Types with a bit size that is not a multiple of a byte, e.g. i1.
GEPs into such vectors are questionable to begin with, as some elements
  are not even addressable.
* Overaligned types, e.g. i16 with 32-bit alignment.

Existing tests are unaffected, but a miscompilation of a new test is fixed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Nikita Popov <github@npopov.com>

This reverts commit d87b9b81ccb95217181ce75515c6c68bbb408ca4.

Post commit review raised concerns, reverting while discussion happens.

It used to be that all of our intrinsics were call instructions, but over time, we've added more and more invokable intrinsics. According to the verifier, we're up to 8 right now. As IntrinsicInst is a sub-class of CallInst, this puts us in an awkward spot where the idiomatic means to check for intrinsic has a false negative if the intrinsic is invoked.

This change switches IntrinsicInst from being a sub-class of CallInst to being a subclass of CallBase. This allows invoked intrinsics to be instances of IntrinsicInst, at the cost of requiring a few more casts to CallInst in places where the intrinsic really is known to be a call, not an invoke.

After this lands and has baked for a couple days, planned cleanups:
    Make GCStatepointInst a IntrinsicInst subclass.
    Merge intrinsic handling in InstCombine and use idiomatic visitIntrinsicInst entry point for InstVisitor.
    Do the same in SelectionDAG.
    Do the same in FastISEL.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99976

This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().

I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882

Summary:
Introduce new types for fixed width and scalable vectors.

Does not remove getNumElements yet so as to not break code during transition
period.

Reviewers: deadalnix, efriedma, sdesmalen, craig.topper, huntergr

Reviewed By: sdesmalen

Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, csigg, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, kerbowa, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, lldb-commits, tschuett, hiraditya, rkruppe, psnobl, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm, #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77587

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78475

Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.

This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.

I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors.  Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it.  Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467