Use deduction guides instead of helper functions.

The only non-automatic changes have been:

1. ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, 0) needs to be changed into ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, (size_t)0) to avoid an ambiguous call with ArrayRef((uint8_t*), (uint8_t*))
2. CVSymbol sym(makeArrayRef(symStorage)); needed to be rewritten as CVSymbol sym{ArrayRef(symStorage)}; otherwise the compiler is confused and thinks we have a (bad) function prototype. There was a few similar situation across the codebase.
3. ADL doesn't seem to work the same for deduction-guides and functions, so at some point the llvm namespace must be explicitly stated.
4. The "reference mode" of makeArrayRef(ArrayRef<T> &) that acts as no-op is not supported (a constructor cannot achieve that).

Per reviewers' comment, some useless makeArrayRef have been removed in the process.

This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896 that introduced
the deduction guides.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140955

This patch fixes an issue in which ConstantAsMetadata arguments to a
DIArglist, as well as the Constant values referenced by that metadata,
would not be always be emitted correctly into bitcode. This patch fixes
this issue firstly by searching for ConstantAsMetadata in DIArgLists
(previously we would only search for them when directly wrapped in
MetadataAsValue), and secondly by enumerating all of a DIArgList's
arguments directly prior to enumerating the DIArgList itself.

This patch also adds a number of asserts, and no longer treats the
arguments to a DIArgList as optional fields when reading/writing to
bitcode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100572

The forward declarations are already present in the header.

to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

DenseMaps require the definition of a type to be available when using a
pointer to that type as a key to know how many bits are available for
tombstone/etc.

llvm-svn: 317360

llvm-svn: 312760

Summary:
That API creates a temporary AttributeList to carry an index and a
single AttributeSet. We need to carry the index in addition to the set,
because that is how attribute groups are currently encoded.

NFC

Reviewers: pcc

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32262

llvm-svn: 301245

Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.

Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.

It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.

Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete

Reviewed By: pete

Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102

llvm-svn: 298393

Summary:

Compiling with GCC 5 or later can fail with a bogus error "constructor
required before non-static data member for
llvm::ValueEnumerator::MDRange::First has been parsed".

This was originally fixed upstream in GCC PR 70528, but later this fix
was reverted, and released versions of GCC still show the bogus error.

To work around this, replace MDRange's declaration of a default
constructor with a definition.

Reviewers: dexonsmith, rsmith, rivanvx

Subscribers: llvm-commits, dim, dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18730

llvm-svn: 289454