Add an index-wide flag indicating whether index-based internalization
and promotion have completed. This will be used in a follow on change.

Module flag is used to indicate the feature to be propagated to the
function. As now the frontend emits all attributes accordingly let's
help the auto upgrade to only do work when old and new bitcodes are
merged.

Depends on #82819 and #86031

In preparation of adding the "AllocToken" pass, add the pre-requisite
`sanitize_alloc_token` function attribute and `alloc_token` metadata.

---

This change is part of the following series:
  1. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160131
  2. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156838
  3. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162098
  4. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162099
  5. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156839
  6. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156840
  7. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156841
  8. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156842

Add a new named module-level frontend-annotated metadata that
specifies the TBAA node for an integer access, for which, C/C++
`errno` accesses are guaranteed to use (under strict aliasing).
This should allow LLVM to prove the involved memory location/
accesses may not alias `errno`; thus, to perform optimizations
around errno-writing libcalls (store-to-load forwarding amongst
others).

Previous discussion: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-modelling-errno-memory-effects/82972.

This introduces a new `ptrtoaddr` instruction which is similar to
`ptrtoint` but has two differences:

1) Unlike `ptrtoint`, `ptrtoaddr` does not capture provenance
2) `ptrtoaddr` only extracts (and then extends/truncates) the low
   index-width bits of the pointer

For most architectures, difference 2) does not matter since index (address)
width and pointer representation width are the same, but this does make a
difference for architectures that have pointers that aren't just plain
integer addresses such as AMDGPU fat pointers or CHERI capabilities.

This commit introduces textual and bitcode IR support as well as basic code
generation, but optimization passes do not handle the new instruction yet
so it may result in worse code than using ptrtoint. Follow-up changes will
update capture tracking, etc. for the new instruction.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/clarifiying-the-semantics-of-ptrtoint/83987/54

Reviewed By: nikic

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139357

When materializing a function, we'd upgrade all calls to all upgraded
intrinsics. However, this would operate on all calls to the intrinsic
(including previously materialized ones), which leads to quadratic
complexity.

Instead, only upgrade the calls that are in the materialized function.

This fixes a compile-time regression introduced by #149310.

lifetime.start and lifetime.end are primarily intended for use on
allocas, to enable stack coloring and other liveness optimizations. This
is necessary because all (static) allocas are hoisted into the entry
block, so lifetime markers are the only way to convey the actual
lifetimes.

However, lifetime.start and lifetime.end are currently *allowed* to be
used on non-alloca pointers. We don't actually do this in practice, but
just the mere fact that this is possible breaks the core purpose of the
lifetime markers, which is stack coloring of allocas. Stack coloring can
only work correctly if all lifetime markers for an alloca are
analyzable.

* If a lifetime marker may operate on multiple allocas via a select/phi,
we don't know which lifetime actually starts/ends and handle it
incorrectly (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/104776).
* Stack coloring operates on the assumption that all lifetime markers
are visible, and not, for example, hidden behind a function call or
escaped pointer. It's not possible to change this, as part of the
purpose of lifetime markers is that they work even in the presence of
escaped pointers, where simple use analysis is insufficient.

I don't think there is any way to have coherent semantics for lifetime
markers on allocas, while also permitting them on arbitrary pointer
values.

This PR restricts lifetimes to operate on allocas only. As a followup, I
will also drop the size argument, which is superfluous if we always
operate on an alloca. (This change also renders various code handling
lifetime markers on non-alloca dead. I plan to clean up that kind of
code after dropping the size argument as well.)

In practice, I've only found a few places that currently produce
lifetimes on non-allocas:

* CoroEarly replaces the promise alloca with the result of an intrinsic,
which will later be replaced back with an alloca. I think this is the
only place where there is some legitimate loss of functionality, but I
don't think this is particularly important (I don't think we'd expect
the promise in a coroutine to admit useful lifetime optimization.)
* SafeStack moves unsafe allocas onto a separate frame. We can safely
drop lifetimes here, as SafeStack performs its own stack coloring.
* Similar for AddressSanitizer, it also moves allocas into separate
memory.
* LSR sometimes replaces the lifetime argument with a GEP chain of the
alloca (where the offsets ultimately cancel out). This is just
unnecessary. (Fixed separately in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149492.)
* InferAddrSpaces sometimes makes lifetimes operate on an addrspacecast
of an alloca. I don't think this is necessary.

This is a fix additional to #92162

In some cases, section names contain a whitespace between the segment
name and the actual section name (e.g. `__TEXT, __swift5_proto`). It is
confirmed by source code of the Swift compiler

This fix allows LTO to work correctly with the `-ObjC` flag in that rare
case when only a section with a whitespace in the name is present in the
linked bitcode module, but there are no sections containing
`__TEXT,__swift`

---------

Co-authored-by: Ураков Александр Сергеевич <a.urakov@tbank.ru>
Co-authored-by: Ellis Hoag <ellis.sparky.hoag@gmail.com>

Serialise key-instruction fields of DILocations and DISubprograms into
and outof bitcode, add tests. debug-info bitcode sizes grow, but it
balances out given an earlier size optimisation in 51f4e2c.

Co-authored-by: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <orlando.hyams@sony.com>