The test reads 400 bytes of memory above the local variable. If the
stack is shallow, this can reach non-allocated space, resulting in a
test failure. The patch fixes the issue by reserving enough space in
the upper stack frame.

We now bubble up the expression evaluation diagnostics to the user and
also distinguish between "expression failed to parse/run" versus other
ways in which expressions didn't complete (e.g., setup errors, etc.).

Before:
```
(lldb) memory find -e "" 0x16fdfedc0 0x16fdfede0
error: expression evaluation failed. pass a string instead
(lldb) memory find -e "invalid" 0x16fdfedc0 0x16fdfede0
error: expression evaluation failed. pass a string instead
```

After:
```
(lldb) memory find -e "" 0x16fdfedc0 0x16fdfede0
error: Expression evaluation failed:
error: No result returned from expression. Exit status: 1
(lldb) memory find -e "invalid" 0x16fdfedc0 0x16fdfede0
error: Expression evaluation failed:
error: <user expression 0>:1:1: use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'
    1 | invalid
      | ^~~~~~~
```

This patch factors out the `-e` option logic into two helper functions.
The `EvaluateExpression` helper might seem redundant but I'll be adding
to it in a follow-up patch to fix an issue when running `memory find -e`
for Swift targets.

Also adds test coverage for the error cases that were previously
untested.

rdar://152113525

This patch fixes an issue where the `memory find` command would
effectively stop searching after encountering a memory read error (which
could happen due to unreadable memory), without giving any indication
that it has done so (it would just print it could not find the pattern).

To make matters worse, it would not terminate after encountering this
error, but rather proceed to slowly increment the address pointer, which
meant that searching a large region could take a very long time (and
give the appearance that lldb is actually searching for the thing).

The patch fixes this first problem by detecting read errors and
skipping over (using GetMemoryRegionInfo) the unreadable parts of memory
and resuming the search after them. It also reads the memory in bulk
(`max(sizeof(pattern))`), which speeds up the search significantly (up
to 6x for live processes, 18x for core files).

`memory read` will return an error if you try to read more than 1k bytes
in a single command, instructing you to set
`target.max-memory-read-size` or use `--force` if you intended to read
more than that. This is a safeguard for a command where people are being
explicit about how much memory they would like lldb to read (either to
display, or save to a file) and is an annoyance every time you need to
read more than a small amount. If someone confuses the --count argument
with the start address, lldb may begin dumping gigabytes of data but I'd
rather that behavior than requiring everyone to special-case their way
around a common use case.

I don't want to remove the setting because many people have added (much
larger) default max read sizes to their ~/.lldbinit files after hitting
this behavior. Another option would be to stop reading/using the value
in Target.cpp, but I see no harm in leaving the setting if someone
really does prefer to have a small cap on their memory read size.

ReadProcessMemory will not perform the read if part of the memory is
unreadable (and even though the API has a `number_of_bytes_read`
argument). To make this work, I explicitly inspect the memory region
being read and only read the accessible part.

Previously, we were returning an error if we couldn't read the whole
region. This doesn't matter most of the time, because lldb caches memory
reads, and in that process it aligns them to cache line boundaries. As
(LLDB) cache lines are smaller than pages, the reads are unlikely to
cross page boundaries.

Nonetheless, this can cause a problem for large reads (which bypass the
cache), where we're unable to read anything even if just a single byte
of the memory is unreadable. This patch fixes the lldb-server to do
that, and also changes the linux implementation, to reuse any partial
results it got from the process_vm_readv call (to avoid having to
re-read everything again using ptrace, only to find that it stopped at
the same place).

This matches debugserver behavior. It is also consistent with the gdb
remote protocol documentation, but -- notably -- not with actual
gdbserver behavior (which returns errors instead of partial results). We
filed a
[clarification
bug](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24751) several
years ago. Though we did not really reach a conclusion there, I think
this is the most logical behavior.

The associated test does not currently pass on windows, because the
windows memory read APIs don't support partial reads (I have a WIP patch
to work around that).

TargetProperties.td had a few settings listed as signed integral values,
but the Target.cpp methods reading those values were reading them as
unsigned. e.g. target.max-memory-read-size, some accesses of
target.max-children-count, still today, previously
target.max-string-summary-length.

After Jonas' change to use templates to read these values in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D149774, when the code tried to fetch these
values, we'd eventually end up calling OptionValue::GetAsUInt64 which
checks that the value is actually a UInt64 before returning it; finding
that it was an SInt64, it would drop the user setting and return the
default value. This manifested as a bug that target.max-memory-read-size
is never used for memory read.

target.max-children-count is less straightforward, where one read of
that setting was fetching it as an int64_t, the other as a uint64_t.

I suspect all of these settings were originally marked as SInt64 so a
user could do -1 for "infinite", getting it static_cast to a UINT64_MAX
value along the way. I can't find any documentation for this behavior,
but it seems like something Greg would have done. We've partially lost
that behavior already via
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72233 for
target.max-string-summary-length, and this further removes it.

We're still fetching UInt64's and returning them as uint32_t's but I'm
not overly pressed about someone setting a count/size limit over 4GB.

I added a simple API test for the memory read setting limit.

assertEquals is a deprecated alias for assertEqual and has been removed
in Python 3.12. This wasn't an issue previously because we used a
vendored version of the unittest module. Now that we use the built-in
version this gets updated together with the Python version used to run
the test suite.

This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460