This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460

This change adds a `--recognizer-function` (`-R`) to `type summary add`
and `type synth add` that allows users to specify that the names in
the command are not type names but python function names.

It also adds an example to lldb/examples, and a section in the data
formatters documentation on how to use recognizer functions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137000

This patch adds a new matching method for data formatters, in addition
to the existing exact typename and regex-based matching. The new method
allows users to specify the name of a Python callback function that
takes a `SBType` object and decides whether the type is a match or not.

Here is an overview of the changes performed:

- Add a new `eFormatterMatchCallback` matching type, and logic to handle
  it in `TypeMatcher` and `SBTypeNameSpecifier`.

- Extend `FormattersMatchCandidate` instances with a pointer to the
  current `ScriptInterpreter` and the `TypeImpl` corresponding to the
  candidate type, so we can run registered callbacks and pass the type
  to them. All matcher search functions now receive a
  `FormattersMatchCandidate` instead of a type name.

- Add some glue code to ScriptInterpreterPython and the SWIG bindings to
  allow calling a formatter matching callback. Most of this code is
  modeled after the equivalent code for watchpoint callback functions.

- Add an API test for the new callback-based matching feature.

For more context, please check the RFC thread where this feature was
originally discussed:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-python-callback-for-data-formatters-type-matching/64204/11

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135648