Support case-insensitive regex matches for `SBTarget::FindGlobalFunctions` and `SBTarget::FindGlobalVariables`.
Summary: Currently the breakpoint command is prompting the user to file a bug report if the provided regex is invalid: ``` (lldb) rbreak *foo error: Function name regular expression could not be compiled: "Inconvertible error value. An error has occurred that could not be converted to a known std::error_code. Please file a bug. repetition-operator operand invalid" ``` The reason is simply that we are using the wrong StringError constructor (the one with the error code as the first parameter is also printing the string version of the error code, and the inconvertible error code is just an invalid place holder code with that description). Switching the StringError constructor parameters will only print the error message we get from the regex engine when we convert the error into a string. I checked the rest of the code base and I couldn't find the same issue anywhere else. Fixes rdar://62233561 Reviewers: JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78808
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with std::string_view. There should be no functional change here. This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies. This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary: A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this: ``` //===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===// ``` However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this is done in the same way in other files). This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators, all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line). Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere Reviewed By: JDevlieghere Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits Tags: #lldb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66463 llvm-svn: 369398
I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the regex. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66392 llvm-svn: 369352
Originally I wanted to remove the RegularExpression class in Utility and replace it with llvm::Regex. However, during that transition I noticed that there are several places where need the regular expression string. So instead I propose to keep the RegularExpression class and make it a thin wrapper around llvm::Regex. This patch also removes the workaround for empty regular expressions. The result is that we are now (more or less) POSIX conformant. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66174 llvm-svn: 369153
llvm-svn: 368243
The copy constructor of RegularExpression doesn't initialize m_comp_err. This causes an use-of-initialized-value error when a RegularExpression is copied: the copy constructor calls Compile, which calls Free to free the existing regex if needed, which in turn reads m_comp_err to check if there's any regex to be freed. This change calls the default constructor from the other constructors to make sure members are always initialized with sensible values. This also avoids duplicating init logic, like the RegularExpression(llvm:StringRef) constructor does, which is error prone. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62334 llvm-svn: 361546
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the begging and end of the comment. Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit, where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much. Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment. I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508 llvm-svn: 358135