This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.

I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

We now have a utility function for this purpose.

(Also fixing the typo in the related comment while I'm at it.)

llvm-svn: 372946

We currently have two lists in the CompletionRequest that we
inherited from the old API: The complete list of arguments ignoring
where the user requested completion and the list of arguments that
stops at the cursor. Having two lists of arguments is confusing
and can lead to subtle errors, so let's remove the complete list
until we actually need it.

llvm-svn: 372692

The fact that index==-1 means "no arguments" is not obvious and only
used in one place from what I can tell. Also fixes several warnings
about using the cursor index as if it was a size_t when comparing.

Not fully NFC as we now also correctly update the partial argument list
when injecting the fake empty argument in the CompletionRequest
constructor.

llvm-svn: 372566

Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:

* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.

I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.

A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:

* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
  They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
  breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
  as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.

  Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
  in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
  I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
  Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
  (even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
  All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
  as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).

* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
  reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
  that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
  1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
  0-based like Xcode has to do).

* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
  idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
  `WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
  provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
  The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
  definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).

This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.

For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).

I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536

llvm-svn: 369624

Before we just triggered undefined behavior on invalid positions.

llvm-svn: 368444

Completion requests have two fields that are essentially unimplemented:
`m_match_start_point` and `m_max_return_elements`. This would've been
okay, if it wasn't for the fact that this caused a bunch of useless
parameters to be passed around. Occasionally there would be a comment or
assert saying that they are not supported. This patch removes them.

llvm-svn: 367385

to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

Summary:
This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide.
It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code.

Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions
can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions
are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name
when providing completion for a symbol.

There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective
APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be
used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a
list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that
essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to
`descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call).

The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing
short help that is already added in LLDB.

An example completion with descriptions looks like this:
```
(lldb) pl
Available completions:
        platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms.
        plugin   -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins.
```

Reviewers: #lldb, jingham

Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham

Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175

llvm-svn: 342181