If your arguments or option values are of a type that naturally uses one
of our common completion mechanisms, you will get completion for free.
But if you have your own custom values or if you want to do fancy things
like have `break set -s foo.dylib -n ba<TAB>` only complete on symbols
in foo.dylib, you can use this new mechanism to achieve that.

This patch re-lands #105449 and fixes the various test failures.

---------

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>

...and "[lldb/Interpreter] Introduce `ScriptedStopHook{,Python}Interface` & make use of it (#105449)"

This reverts commit 76b827bb4d5b4cc4d3229c4c6de2529e8b156810, and commit 1e131ddfa8f1d7b18c85c6e4079458be8b419421
because the first commit caused the test command-stop-hook-output.test to fail.

This patch introduces new `ScriptedStopHook{,Python}Interface` classes
that make use of the Scripted Interface infrastructure and makes use of
it in `StopHookScripted`.

It also relax the requirement on the number of argument for initializing
scripting extension if the size of the interface parameter pack contains
1 less element than the extension maximum number of positional arguments
for this initializer.
This addresses the cases where the embedded interpreter session
dictionary is passed to the extension initializer which is not used most
of the time.

---------

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>

This reverts commit 547917aebd1e79a8929b53f0ddf3b5185ee4df74.

This reverts commit f01f80ce6ca7640bb0e267b84b1ed0e89b57e2d9.

This commit introduces an msan violation. See the discussion on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104523.

Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are
fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the
compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible
mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and
automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and
`down`.

This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still
provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a
hint that frames have been hidden.

My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift
programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for
`std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while
debugging LLDB.

rdar://126629381


Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even
more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without
the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's
really only meant as an example).

before:
```
(lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
    frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
    frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12
    frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10
    frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
    frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
(lldb) 
```

after

```
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
    frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
    frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers
```

Reverts https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97273 since it broke
the windows bot:

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/1025/steps/4/logs/stdio

This patch tries to fix the following build failure on windows:

https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/141/builds/1083

This started happening following 2914a4b88837, and it seems to be caused
by some special `#include` ordering for the lldb-python header on Windows.

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>

Among other things, returning an empty string as the repeat command
disables auto-repeat, which can be useful for state-changing commands.

There's one remaining refinement to this setup, which is that for parsed
script commands, it should be possible to change an option value, or add
a new option value that wasn't originally specified, then ask lldb "make
this back into a command string". That would make doing fancy things
with repeat commands easier.

That capability isn't present in the lldb_private side either, however.
So that's for a next iteration.

I haven't added this to the docs on adding commands yet. I wanted to
make sure this was an acceptable approach before I spend the time to do
that.