This structure is supposed to be trivial, so we cannot simply do
"= nullptr;" on the new member. Doing that means you are non trivial,
regardless of whether you emulate the previously implied constructor somehow.

The next option is to update every use of brace initialisation.

Given that this is some hundreds of lines, this change just adds a dummy
pointer that is set to nullptr. Subsequent changes will actually use that
to point to register flags information.

Note: This change is not clang-format-ted because it changes a bunch of
areas that are not themselves formatted. It would just add noise.

Reviewed By: jasonmolenda, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145568

"Dynamic register info" is a very overloaded term, and this particular
instance of it was only used for passing the information about the
"orig_[re]ax" pseudo-register on x86 through some generic code. Since
both sides of the code are x86-specific, I have replaced this with a
more direct route.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147045

Using GetTargetArchitecture() instead of m_target_arch, and set m_target_arch to private.

Reviewed By: DavidSpickett

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132353

Currently, lldb-server was opening the executable file to determine the
process architecture (to differentiate between 32 and 64 bit
architecture flavours). This isn't a particularly trustworthy source of
information (the file could have been changed since the process was
started) and it is not always available (file could be deleted or
otherwise inaccessible).

Unfortunately, ptrace does not give us a direct API to access the
process architecture, but we can still infer it via some of its
responses -- given that the general purpose register set of 64-bit
applications is larger [citation needed] than the GPR set of 32-bit
ones, we can just ask for the application GPR set and check its size.

This is what this patch does.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130985

The previous version of the patch did not update the definitions in
conditionally compiled code. This patch includes changes to ARC and
windows targets.

Original commit message was:

These were added to support some mips registers on linux, but linux mips
support has now been removed due.

They are still referenced in the freebds mips implementation, but the
completeness of that implementation is also unknown. All other
architectures just set these fields to zero, which is a cause of
significant bloat in our register info definitions.

Arm also has registers with variable sizes, but they were implemented in
a more gdb-compatible fashion and don't use this feature.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110914

This reverts commit 00e704bf080ffeeb9e334fb3ab71594f9aa50969.

This commit should should have updated
llvm/llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/ABI/ARC/ABISysV_arc.cpp like the other
architectures.

These were added to support some mips registers on linux, but linux mips
support has now been removed due.

They are still referenced in the freebds mips implementation, but the
completeness of that implementation is also unknown. All other
architectures just set these fields to zero, which is a cause of
significant bloat in our register info definitions.

Arm also has registers with variable sizes, but they were implemented in
a more gdb-compatible fashion and don't use this feature.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110914

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]

This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.

This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:

```
run-clang-tidy.py \
	-header-filter='.*' \
	-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
	-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
	-format \
	-style LLVM \
	-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```

NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.

NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.

Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #lldb, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847

llvm-svn: 361484

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135