<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>llvm-project.git/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.h, branch main</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo</title>
<updated>2019-01-19T08:50:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Chandler Carruth</name>
<email>chandlerc@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-01-19T08:50:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=2946cd701067404b99c39fb29dc9c74bd7193eb3'/>
<id>2946cd701067404b99c39fb29dc9c74bd7193eb3</id>
<content type='text'>
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>NPL: Fix single step workaround</title>
<updated>2017-02-16T18:12:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>labath@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-02-16T18:12:04+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=7278496ccf9390e10ce962636ef7270fb4007709'/>
<id>7278496ccf9390e10ce962636ef7270fb4007709</id>
<content type='text'>
While refactoring the code in r293046 I made a very basic error -
relying on destructor side-effects of a copyable object. Fix that and
make the object non-copyable.

This fixes the tests on the platforms that need this workaround, but
unfortunately we don't have a way to make a more platform-agnostic test
right now.

llvm-svn: 295345
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
While refactoring the code in r293046 I made a very basic error -
relying on destructor side-effects of a copyable object. Fix that and
make the object non-copyable.

This fixes the tests on the platforms that need this workaround, but
unfortunately we don't have a way to make a more platform-agnostic test
right now.

llvm-svn: 295345
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>NPL: Compartmentalize arm64 single step workaround better</title>
<updated>2017-01-25T11:19:45+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>labath@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-01-25T11:19:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=8abd34f0155a162a37c4dd692b65604ccbcb14d1'/>
<id>8abd34f0155a162a37c4dd692b65604ccbcb14d1</id>
<content type='text'>
The main motivation for me doing this is being able to build an arm
android lldb-server against api level 9 headers, but it seems like a
good cleanup nonetheless.

The entirety of the cpu_set_t dance now resides in SingleStepCheck.cpp,
which is only built on arm64.

llvm-svn: 293046
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The main motivation for me doing this is being able to build an arm
android lldb-server against api level 9 headers, but it seems like a
good cleanup nonetheless.

The entirety of the cpu_set_t dance now resides in SingleStepCheck.cpp,
which is only built on arm64.

llvm-svn: 293046
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code</title>
<updated>2016-09-06T20:57:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kate Stone</name>
<email>katherine.stone@apple.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-09-06T20:57:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=b9c1b51e45b845debb76d8658edabca70ca56079'/>
<id>b9c1b51e45b845debb76d8658edabca70ca56079</id>
<content type='text'>
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style.  This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort.  Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit.  The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

    find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
    find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit.  There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit.  YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style.  This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort.  Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit.  The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

    find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
    find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit.  There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit.  YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Work around a stepping bug in arm64 android M</title>
<updated>2016-02-23T13:56:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>labath@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-02-23T13:56:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=605b51b84e622ce64ee77b066599c7b16d9d2c9d'/>
<id>605b51b84e622ce64ee77b066599c7b16d9d2c9d</id>
<content type='text'>
Summary:
On arm64, linux&lt;=4.4 and Android&lt;=M there is a bug, which prevents single-stepping from working when
the system comes back from suspend, because of incorrectly initialized CPUs. This did not really
affect Android&lt;M, because it did not use software suspend, but it is a problem for M, which uses
suspend (doze) quite extensively.  Fortunately, it seems that the first CPU is not affected by
this bug, so this commit implements a workaround by forcing the inferior to execute on the first
cpu whenever we are doing single stepping.

While inside, I have moved the implementations of Resume() and SingleStep() to the thread class
(instead of process).

Reviewers: tberghammer, ovyalov

Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17509

llvm-svn: 261636
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Summary:
On arm64, linux&lt;=4.4 and Android&lt;=M there is a bug, which prevents single-stepping from working when
the system comes back from suspend, because of incorrectly initialized CPUs. This did not really
affect Android&lt;M, because it did not use software suspend, but it is a problem for M, which uses
suspend (doze) quite extensively.  Fortunately, it seems that the first CPU is not affected by
this bug, so this commit implements a workaround by forcing the inferior to execute on the first
cpu whenever we are doing single stepping.

While inside, I have moved the implementations of Resume() and SingleStep() to the thread class
(instead of process).

Reviewers: tberghammer, ovyalov

Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17509

llvm-svn: 261636
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
