<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>llvm-project.git/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/NativeRegisterContextLinux.h, branch main</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)</title>
<updated>2023-01-07T22:18:35+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kazu Hirata</name>
<email>kazu@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-01-07T22:18:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=2fe8327406050d2585d2ced910a678e28caefcf5'/>
<id>2fe8327406050d2585d2ced910a678e28caefcf5</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional&lt; with std::optional&lt;.  I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional&lt; with std::optional&lt;.  I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] Add #include &lt;optional&gt; (NFC)</title>
<updated>2023-01-07T21:43:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kazu Hirata</name>
<email>kazu@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-01-07T21:43:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=f190ce625ab0dc5a5e2b2515e6d26debb34843ab'/>
<id>f190ce625ab0dc5a5e2b2515e6d26debb34843ab</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch adds #include &lt;optional&gt; to those files containing
llvm::Optional&lt;...&gt; or Optional&lt;...&gt;.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch adds #include &lt;optional&gt; to those files containing
llvm::Optional&lt;...&gt; or Optional&lt;...&gt;.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)</title>
<updated>2022-12-05T00:51:25+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kazu Hirata</name>
<email>kazu@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-12-05T00:51:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=343523d040d1ede65a35d8a6d514b0f7c198a3f2'/>
<id>343523d040d1ede65a35d8a6d514b0f7c198a3f2</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] Fix TestDeletedExecutable on linux</title>
<updated>2022-08-03T13:44:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>pavel@labath.sk</email>
</author>
<published>2022-08-02T11:34:24+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=69c39e2abc311aa226d54b82a2cc8fa648902c7d'/>
<id>69c39e2abc311aa226d54b82a2cc8fa648902c7d</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, lldb-server was opening the executable file to determine the
process architecture (to differentiate between 32 and 64 bit
architecture flavours). This isn't a particularly trustworthy source of
information (the file could have been changed since the process was
started) and it is not always available (file could be deleted or
otherwise inaccessible).

Unfortunately, ptrace does not give us a direct API to access the
process architecture, but we can still infer it via some of its
responses -- given that the general purpose register set of 64-bit
applications is larger [citation needed] than the GPR set of 32-bit
ones, we can just ask for the application GPR set and check its size.

This is what this patch does.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130985
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Currently, lldb-server was opening the executable file to determine the
process architecture (to differentiate between 32 and 64 bit
architecture flavours). This isn't a particularly trustworthy source of
information (the file could have been changed since the process was
started) and it is not always available (file could be deleted or
otherwise inaccessible).

Unfortunately, ptrace does not give us a direct API to access the
process architecture, but we can still infer it via some of its
responses -- given that the general purpose register set of 64-bit
applications is larger [citation needed] than the GPR set of 32-bit
ones, we can just ask for the application GPR set and check its size.

This is what this patch does.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130985
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb][AArch64] Add memory tag reading to lldb-server</title>
<updated>2021-06-24T16:02:55+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>David Spickett</name>
<email>david.spickett@linaro.org</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-19T15:57:59+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=da2e614f56b196b37175e2babfac8ed7b43ab624'/>
<id>da2e614f56b196b37175e2babfac8ed7b43ab624</id>
<content type='text'>
This adds memory tag reading using the new "qMemTags"
packet and ptrace on AArch64 Linux.

This new packet is following the one used by GDB.
(https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/General-Query-Packets.html)

On AArch64 Linux we use ptrace's PEEKMTETAGS to read
tags and we assume that lldb has already checked that the
memory region actually has tagging enabled.

We do not assume that lldb has expanded the requested range
to granules and expand it again to be sure.
(although lldb will be sending aligned ranges because it happens
to need them client side anyway)
Also we don't assume untagged addresses. So for AArch64 we'll
remove the top byte before using them. (the top byte includes
MTE and other non address data)

To do the ptrace read NativeProcessLinux will ask the native
register context for a memory tag manager based on the
type in the packet. This also gives you the ptrace numbers you need.
(it's called a register context but it also has non register data,
so it saves adding another per platform sub class)

The only supported platform for this is AArch64 Linux and the only
supported tag type is MTE allocation tags. Anything else will
error.

Ptrace can return a partial result but for lldb-server we will
be treating that as an error. To succeed we need to get all the tags
we expect.

(Note that the protocol leaves room for logical tags to be
read via qMemTags but this is not going to be implemented for lldb
at this time.)

Reviewed By: omjavaid

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95601
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This adds memory tag reading using the new "qMemTags"
packet and ptrace on AArch64 Linux.

This new packet is following the one used by GDB.
(https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/General-Query-Packets.html)

On AArch64 Linux we use ptrace's PEEKMTETAGS to read
tags and we assume that lldb has already checked that the
memory region actually has tagging enabled.

We do not assume that lldb has expanded the requested range
to granules and expand it again to be sure.
(although lldb will be sending aligned ranges because it happens
to need them client side anyway)
Also we don't assume untagged addresses. So for AArch64 we'll
remove the top byte before using them. (the top byte includes
MTE and other non address data)

To do the ptrace read NativeProcessLinux will ask the native
register context for a memory tag manager based on the
type in the packet. This also gives you the ptrace numbers you need.
(it's called a register context but it also has non register data,
so it saves adding another per platform sub class)

The only supported platform for this is AArch64 Linux and the only
supported tag type is MTE allocation tags. Anything else will
error.

Ptrace can return a partial result but for lldb-server we will
be treating that as an error. To succeed we need to get all the tags
we expect.

(Note that the protocol leaves room for logical tags to be
read via qMemTags but this is not going to be implemented for lldb
at this time.)

Reviewed By: omjavaid

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95601
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] Fix compilation with gcc-6.5</title>
<updated>2021-04-01T06:44:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>pavel@labath.sk</email>
</author>
<published>2021-04-01T06:13:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=3bea7306e8669f94bacafae68748a9139cfc0b98'/>
<id>3bea7306e8669f94bacafae68748a9139cfc0b98</id>
<content type='text'>
This fixes (works around) two errors with gcc-6.5.
- in the RegisterContext_x86 files, gcc is unable to synthesize a
  default constructor -- it thinks it needs to initialize the virtual
  base class, even though said classes are abstract. I fix that by
  providing a dummy constructor.
- In ReproducerInstrumentationTest, it is not able to deduce that the
  TestingRegistry class is movable (it contains a map of unique
  pointers). I change the type from Optional&lt;TestingRegistry&gt; to
  unique_ptr&lt;TestingRegistry), so that moving is not required
  (copying/moving a polymorphic type is not a very good idea in any
  case).
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This fixes (works around) two errors with gcc-6.5.
- in the RegisterContext_x86 files, gcc is unable to synthesize a
  default constructor -- it thinks it needs to initialize the virtual
  base class, even though said classes are abstract. I fix that by
  providing a dummy constructor.
- In ReproducerInstrumentationTest, it is not able to deduce that the
  TestingRegistry class is movable (it contains a map of unique
  pointers). I change the type from Optional&lt;TestingRegistry&gt; to
  unique_ptr&lt;TestingRegistry), so that moving is not required
  (copying/moving a polymorphic type is not a very good idea in any
  case).
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] Change CreateHostNativeRegisterContextLinux argument type</title>
<updated>2021-03-30T09:45:17+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>pavel@labath.sk</email>
</author>
<published>2021-03-30T09:42:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=d1486e65a1645ca00c3e3109e4e4bb72df1082c3'/>
<id>d1486e65a1645ca00c3e3109e4e4bb72df1082c3</id>
<content type='text'>
to NativeThreadLinux. This avoid casts down the line.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
to NativeThreadLinux. This avoid casts down the line.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb] [Process/Linux] Reuse NativeRegisterContextWatchpoint_x86</title>
<updated>2020-10-26T10:55:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Michał Górny</name>
<email>mgorny@moritz.systems</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-25T14:44:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=f5ca27569eacc398f0e4fc63a9b55cafac398c04'/>
<id>f5ca27569eacc398f0e4fc63a9b55cafac398c04</id>
<content type='text'>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90119
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90119
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[lldb-server][linux] Add ability to allocate memory</title>
<updated>2020-10-14T13:02:09+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Pavel Labath</name>
<email>pavel@labath.sk</email>
</author>
<published>2020-10-09T11:59:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=2c4226f8ac2c925d7e1d59d1de1660cd1dd63f31'/>
<id>2c4226f8ac2c925d7e1d59d1de1660cd1dd63f31</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch adds support for the _M and _m gdb-remote packets, which
(de)allocate memory in the inferior. This works by "injecting" a
m(un)map syscall into the inferior. This consists of:
- finding an executable page of memory
- writing the syscall opcode to it
- setting up registers according to the os syscall convention
- single stepping over the syscall

The advantage of this approach over calling the mmap function is that
this works even in case the mmap function is buggy or unavailable. The
disadvantage is it is more platform-dependent, which is why this patch
only works on X86 (_32 and _64) right now. Adding support for other
linux architectures should be easy and consist of defining the
appropriate syscall constants. Adding support for other OSes depends on
the its ability to do a similar trick.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89124
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch adds support for the _M and _m gdb-remote packets, which
(de)allocate memory in the inferior. This works by "injecting" a
m(un)map syscall into the inferior. This consists of:
- finding an executable page of memory
- writing the syscall opcode to it
- setting up registers according to the os syscall convention
- single stepping over the syscall

The advantage of this approach over calling the mmap function is that
this works even in case the mmap function is buggy or unavailable. The
disadvantage is it is more platform-dependent, which is why this patch
only works on X86 (_32 and _64) right now. Adding support for other
linux architectures should be easy and consist of defining the
appropriate syscall constants. Adding support for other OSes depends on
the its ability to do a similar trick.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89124
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Combine multiple defs of arm64 register sets</title>
<updated>2020-07-07T15:25:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Muhammad Omair Javaid</name>
<email>omair.javaid@linaro.org</email>
</author>
<published>2020-07-07T15:24:14+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=7fa7b81bcbd040d036f9a4155486ccebc3c13be7'/>
<id>7fa7b81bcbd040d036f9a4155486ccebc3c13be7</id>
<content type='text'>
Summary:
This patch aims to combine similar arm64 register set definitions defined in NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64 and RegisterContextPOSIX_arm64.
I have implemented a register set interface out of RegisterInfoInterface class and moved arm64 register sets into RegisterInfosPOSIX_arm64 which is similar to Utility/RegisterContextLinux_* implemented by various other targets. This will help in managing register sets of new ARM64 architecture features in one place.

Built and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf targets.

Reviewers: labath

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: mhorne, emaste, kristof.beyls, atanasyan, danielkiss, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80105
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Summary:
This patch aims to combine similar arm64 register set definitions defined in NativeRegisterContextLinux_arm64 and RegisterContextPOSIX_arm64.
I have implemented a register set interface out of RegisterInfoInterface class and moved arm64 register sets into RegisterInfosPOSIX_arm64 which is similar to Utility/RegisterContextLinux_* implemented by various other targets. This will help in managing register sets of new ARM64 architecture features in one place.

Built and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu, aarch64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf targets.

Reviewers: labath

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: mhorne, emaste, kristof.beyls, atanasyan, danielkiss, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80105
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
