Move the CommandObjectScript and CommandObjectRegexCommand under
Commands where all the other CommandObject implementations live.

Although neither implementations currently use the TableGen-generated
CommandOptions.inc, this move would have been necessary anyway if they
were to in the future.

Summary: This way we can get rid of this 1024 char buffer workaround.

Reviewers: #lldb, labath

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84528

Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).

This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).

Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258

Summary:
We still have some leftovers of the old completion API in the internals of
LLDB that haven't been replaced by the new CompletionRequest. These leftovers
are:

* The return values (int/size_t) in all completion functions.
* Our result array that starts indexing at 1.
* `WordComplete` mode.

I didn't replace them back then because it's tricky to figure out what exactly they
are used for and the completion code is relatively untested. I finally got around
to writing more tests for the API and understanding the semantics, so I think it's
a good time to get rid of them.

A few words why those things should be removed/replaced:

* The return values are really cryptic, partly redundant and rarely documented.
  They are also completely ignored by Xcode, so whatever information they contain will end up
  breaking Xcode's completion mechanism. They are also partly impossible to even implement
  as we assign negative values special meaning and our completion API sometimes returns size_t.

  Completion functions are supposed to return -2 to rewrite the current line. We seem to use this
  in some untested code path to expand the history repeat character to the full command, but
  I haven't figured out why that doesn't work at the moment.
  Completion functions return -1 to 'insert the completion character', but that isn't implemented
  (even though we seem to activate this feature in LLDB sometimes).
  All positive values have to match the number of results. This is obviously just redundant information
  as the user can just look at the result list to get that information (which is what Xcode does).

* The result array that starts indexing at 1 is obviously unexpected. The first element of the array is
  reserved for the common prefix of all completions (e.g. "foobar" and "footar" -> "foo"). The idea is
  that we calculate this to make the life of the API caller easier, but obviously forcing people to have
  1-based indices is not helpful (or even worse, forces them to manually copy the results to make it
  0-based like Xcode has to do).

* The `WordComplete` mode indicates that LLDB should enter a space behind the completion. The
  idea is that we let the top-level API know that we just provided a full completion. Interestingly we
  `WordComplete` is just a single bool that somehow represents all N completions. And we always
  provide full completions in LLDB, so in theory it should always be true.
  The only use it currently serves is providing redundant information about whether we have a single
  definitive completion or not (which we already know from the number of results we get).

This patch essentially removes `WordComplete` mode and makes the result array indexed from 0.
It also removes all return values from all internal completion functions. The only non-redundant information
they contain is about rewriting the current line (which is broken), so that functionality was moved
to the CompletionRequest API. So you can now do `addCompletion("blub", "description", CompletionMode::RewriteLine)`
to do the same.

For the SB API we emulate the old behaviour by making the array indexed from 1 again with the common
prefix at index 0. I didn't keep the special negative return codes as we either never sent them before (e.g. -2) or we
didn't even implement them in the Editline handler (e.g. -1).

I tried to keep this patch minimal and I'm aware we can probably now even further simplify a bunch of related code,
but I would prefer doing this in follow-up NFC commits

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: arphaman, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66536

llvm-svn: 369624

I find as a good cleanup to drop the Compile method. As I do not find TIMTOWTDI
as an advantage and there is already constructor parameter to compile the
regex.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66392

llvm-svn: 369352

Originally I wanted to remove the RegularExpression class in Utility and
replace it with llvm::Regex. However, during that transition I noticed
that there are several places where need the regular expression string.
So instead I propose to keep the RegularExpression class and make it a
thin wrapper around llvm::Regex.

This patch also removes the workaround for empty regular expressions.
The result is that we are now (more or less) POSIX conformant.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66174

llvm-svn: 369153

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

Summary:
We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we
calculated so far. This leads to a few problems:

Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results
by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency,
but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially
the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess
things up right now.

Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with
this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be.
Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently
giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler.

This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to:

1. A handler can suggest a completion.
2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have.

Point 2 obviously means we still have a  dependency left between the different handlers, but
getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch.

Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers.

The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we
don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only
been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch
as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself.

Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath

Reviewed By: davide

Subscribers: lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322

llvm-svn: 338151