ValueObject is part of lldbCore for historical reasons, but conceptually
it deserves to be its own library. This does introduce a (link-time) circular
dependency between lldbCore and lldbValueObject, which is unfortunate
but probably unavoidable because so many things in LLDB rely on
ValueObject. We already have cycles and these libraries are never built
as dylibs so while this doesn't improve the situation, it also doesn't
make things worse.

The header includes were updated with the following command:

```
find . -type f -exec sed -i.bak "s%include \"lldb/Core/ValueObject%include \"lldb/ValueObject/ValueObject%" '{}' \;
```

As specified in the docs,
1) raw_string_ostream is always unbuffered and
2) the underlying buffer may be used directly

( 65b13610a5226b84889b923bae884ba395ad084d for further reference )

* Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush(), which is essentially a no-op.
* Avoid unneeded calls to raw_string_ostream::str(), to avoid excess
indirection.

This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.

This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.

This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()

Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form

`    ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to

`    llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?

The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly

` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.

The constructor initializes `*this` with a copy of `M->getDataLayout()`,
which can just be spelled as `DataLayout DL = M->getDataLayout()`. In
all places where the constructor is used, Module outlives DataLayout, so
store a reference to it instead of cloning.

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102839

If a weak function is missing, still return it's address (zero) rather
than failing interpretation. Otherwise we have a mismatch between
Interpret() and CanInterpret() resulting in failures that would not
occur with JIT execution.

Alternatively, we could try to look for weak symbols in CanInterpret()
and generally reject them there.

This is the root cause for the issue exposed by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92885. Previously, the case
affected by that always fell back to JIT because an icmp constant
expression was used, which is not supported by the interpreter. Now a
normal icmp instruction is used, which is supported. However, we fail to
interpret due to incorrect handling of weak function addresses.

Uses of (void) remain where they are for purposes other than an
assert variable.

Check the interrupt flag while interpreting IR expressions and allow the
user to interrupt them.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156822

At the moment the IRInterpreter will stop interpreting an expression
after a hardcoded 4096 instructions. After it reaches the limit it will
stop interpreting and leave the process in whatever state it was when
the timeout was reached.

This patch changes the instruction limit to a timeout and uses the
user-specified expression timeout value for this. The main motivation is
to allow users on targets where we can't use the JIT to run more
complicated expressions if they really want to (which they can do now by
just increasing the timeout).

The time-based approach also seems much more meaningful than the
arbitrary (and very low) instruction limit. 4096 instructions can be
interpreted in a few microseconds on some setups but might take much
longer if we have a slow connection to the target. I don't think any
user actually cares about the number of instructions that are executed
but only about the time they are willing to wait for a result.

Based off an original patch by Raphael Isemann.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102762

This line existed in our internal branch and seems to be generally
useful, so I'm upstreaming it.