This will make changes in #145599 a bit nicer.

The `TestMemoryHistory.py`/`TestReportData.py` are currently failing on
the x86 macOS CI (started after we upgraded the Xcode SDK on that
machien). The LLDB ASAN utility expression is failing to run with
following error:
```
(lldb) image lookup -n __asan_get_alloc_stack
1 match found in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_sanitizers.dylib:
        Address: libsystem_sanitizers.dylib[0x00007ffd11e673f7] (libsystem_sanitizers.dylib.__TEXT.__text + 11287)
        Summary: libsystem_sanitizers.dylib`__asan_get_alloc_stack
1 match found in /Users/michaelbuch/Git/lldb-build-main-no-modules/lib/clang/21/lib/darwin/libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib:
        Address: libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib[0x0000000000009ec0] (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib.__TEXT.__text + 34352)
        Summary: libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib`::__asan_get_alloc_stack(__sanitizer::uptr, __sanitizer::uptr *, __sanitizer::uptr, __sanitizer::u32 *) at asan_debugging.cpp:132
(lldb) memory history 'pointer'
Assertion failed: ((uintptr_t)addr == report.access.address), function __asan_get_alloc_stack, file debugger_abi.cpp, line 62.
warning: cannot evaluate AddressSanitizer expression:
error: Expression execution was interrupted: signal SIGABRT.
The process has been returned to the state before expression evaluation.
```

The reason for this is that the system sanitizer dylib and the locally
built libclang_rt contain the same symbol `__asan_get_alloc_stack`, and
depending on the order in which they're loaded, we may pick the one from
the wrong dylib (this probably changed during the buildbot upgrade and
is why it only now started failing). Based on discussion with @wrotki we
always want to pick the one that's in the libclang_rt dylib if it was
loaded, and libsystem_sanitizers otherwise.

This patch addresses this by adding a "preferred lookup context list" to
the expression evaluator. Currently this is only exposed in the
`EvaluateExpressionOptions`. We make it a `SymbolContextList` in case we
want the lookup contexts to be contexts other than modules (e.g., source
files, etc.). In `IRExecutionUnit` we make it a `ModuleList` because it
makes the symbol lookup implementation simpler and we only do module
lookups here anyway. If we ever need it to be a `SymbolContext`, that
transformation shouldn't be too difficult.

Many calls to Function::GetAddressRange() were not interested in the
range itself. Instead they wanted to find the address of the function
(its entry point) or the base address for relocation of function-scoped
entities (technically, the two don't need to be the same, but there's
isn't good reason for them not to be). This PR creates a separate
function for retrieving this, and changes the existing
(non-controversial) uses to call that instead.

Add the ability to override the disassembly CPU and CPU features through
a target setting (`target.disassembly-cpu` and
`target.disassembly-features`) and a `disassemble` command option
(`--cpu` and `--features`).

This is especially relevant for architectures like RISC-V which relies
heavily on CPU extensions.

The majority of this patch is plumbing the options through. I recommend
looking at DisassemblerLLVMC and the test for the observable change in
behavior.

When we search for a symbol, we first check if it is in the module_sp of
the current SymbolContext, and if not, we check in the target's modules.
However, the target's ModuleList also includes the already checked
module, which leads to a redundant search in it.

[lldb][RISCV] add jitted function calls to ABI
Function calls support in LLDB expressions for RISCV: 1 of 4

Augments corresponding functionality to RISCV ABI, which allows to jit
lldb expressions and thus make function calls inside them. Only function
calls with integer and void function arguments and return value are
supported.

[lldb][RISCV] add JIT relocations resolver
Function calls support in LLDB expressions for RISCV: 2 of 4

Adds required RISCV relocations resolving functionality in lldb
ExecutionEngine.

[lldb][RISCV] RISC-V large code model in lldb expressions
Function calls support in LLDB expressions for RISCV: 3 of 4

This patch sets large code model in MCJIT settings for RISC-V 64-bit targets
that allows to make assembly jumps at any 64bit address. This is needed,
because resulted jitted code may contain more that +-2GB jumps, that are
not available in RISC-V with medium code model.

[lldb][RISCV] doubles support in lldb expressions
Function calls support in LLDB expressions for RISCV: 4 of 4

This patch adds desired feature flags in MCJIT compiler to enable
hard-float instructions if target supports them and allows to use floats
and doubles in lldb expressions.

As specified in the docs,
1) raw_string_ostream is always unbuffered and
2) the underlying buffer may be used directly

( 65b13610a5226b84889b923bae884ba395ad084d for further reference )

* Don't call raw_string_ostream::flush(), which is essentially a no-op.
* Avoid unneeded calls to raw_string_ostream::str(), to avoid excess
indirection.

This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.

This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.

This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()

Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form

`    ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to

`    llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?

The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly

` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.

Note that StringRef::equals has been deprecated in favor of
operator==(StringRef, StringRef).

This adds a hint to the missing symbols error message to make it easier
to understand what this means to users.

[Reapplies an earlier patch with a test fix.]