Refactor the command option enum values and the command argument table
to connect the two. This has two benefits:

 - We guarantee that two options that use the same argument type have
   the same accepted values.
 - We can print the enum values and their description in the help
   output. (D129707)

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129703

We dynamically allocate the option validator which means we
can't mark this list of OptionDefinitions as constexpr. It's also
more complicated than necessary.

llvm-svn: 367102

llvm-svn: 366561

Summary: This patch adds documentation that should make it easier to migrate from using the old initializers to the table gen format.

Reviewers: jingham

Reviewed By: jingham

Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, JDevlieghere

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64670

llvm-svn: 366083

Summary:
We currently have man large arrays containing initializers for our command options.
These tables are tricky maintain as we don't have any good place to check them for consistency and
it's also hard to read (`nullptr, {}, 0` is not very descriptive).

This patch fixes this by letting table gen generate those tables. This way we can have a more readable
syntax for this (especially for all the default arguments) and we can let TableCheck check them
for consistency (e.g. an option with an optional argument can't have `eArgTypeNone`, naming of flags', etc.).

Also refactoring the related data structures can now be done without changing the hundred of option initializers.

For example, this line:
```
{LLDB_OPT_SET_ALL, false, "hide-aliases",         'a', OptionParser::eNoArgument, nullptr, {}, 0, eArgTypeNone, "Hide aliases in the command list."},
```
becomes this:
```
  def hide_aliases : Option<"hide-aliases", "a">, Desc<"Hide aliases in the command list.">;
```

For now I just moved a few initializers to the new format to demonstrate the change. I'll slowly migrate the other
option initializers tables  in separate patches.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, sgraenitz

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: jingham, xiaobai, labath, mgorny, abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64365

llvm-svn: 365908