The LLVM Style Guide says the following about error and warning messages
[1]:

> [T]o match error message styles commonly produced by other tools,
> start the first sentence with a lowercase letter, and finish the last
> sentence without a period, if it would end in one otherwise.

I often provide this feedback during code review, but we still have a
bunch of places where we have inconsistent error message, which bothers
me as a user. This PR identifies a handful of those places and updates
the messages to be consistent.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#error-and-warning-messages

Heterogenous lookups allow us to call find with StringRef, avoiding a
temporary heap allocation of std::string.

Sometimes users (esp. gdb-longtime users) accidentally use GDB syntax,
such as `breakpoint foo`, and they would get an error message from LLDB
saying simply `Invalid command "breakpoint foo"`, which is not very
helpful.

This change provides additional suggestions to help correcting the
mistake.

[lldb] Part 1 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::Execute(...)` to return
`void` instead of ~~`bool`~~

Justifications:
- The code doesn't ultimately apply the `true`/`false` return values.
- The methods already pass around a `CommandReturnObject`, typically
with a `result` parameter.
- Each command return object already contains:
	- A more precise status
	- The error code(s) that apply to that status

Part 2 refactors the `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` method.
- See
[https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69991](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69991)

rdar://117378957

Fix a crash when trying to complete an ambiguous subcommand. Take `set s
tar` for example: for the subcommand `s` there's ambiguity between set
and show. Pressing TAB after this input currently crashes LLDB. The
problem is that we're trying to complete `tar` but give up at `s`
because of the ambiguity. LLDB doesn't expect the completed string to be
shorter than the current string and crashes when trying to eliminate the
common prefix.

rdar://111848598

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154643

This is processed by hand in CommandObjectMultiword, and is undiscoverable,
it doesn't work in all cases.  Because it is a bare word, it can't really be
extended w/o introducing the possibility of collisions as well.  If we did
want to do something like this we should add a --help flag to CommandObject.  That
way the feature would be consistent and documented.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142067

This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to clean up the "using" declarations, #include
"llvm/ADT/Optional.h", etc.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716