This is the currently the default for
`SBTarget::ReadInstructions(SBAddress, uint32_t)`. But not for others,
to make it consistent used the user assigned instruction flavour.

Ensure the disassembly respects the "target.x86-disassembly-flavor"
setting for x86 and x86_64 targets.

Depends on #134626

---------

Signed-off-by: Ebuka Ezike <yerimyah1@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonas Devlieghere <jonas@devlieghere.com>

The command already supported disassembling multiple ranges, among other
reasons because inline functions can be discontinuous. The main thing
that was missing was being able to retrieve the function ranges from the
top level function object.

The output of the command for the case where the function entry point is
not its lowest address is somewhat confusing (we're showing negative
offsets), but it is correct.

Lots of code around LLDB was directly accessing the target's section
load list. This NFC patch makes the section load list private so the
Target class can access it, but everyone else now uses accessor
functions. This allows us to control the resolving of addresses and will
allow for functionality in LLDB which can lazily resolve addresses in
JIT plug-ins with a future patch.

Add the ability to override the disassembly CPU and CPU features through
a target setting (`target.disassembly-cpu` and
`target.disassembly-features`) and a `disassemble` command option
(`--cpu` and `--features`).

This is especially relevant for architectures like RISC-V which relies
heavily on CPU extensions.

The majority of this patch is plumbing the options through. I recommend
looking at DisassemblerLLVMC and the test for the observable change in
behavior.

This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.

This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.

This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()

Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form

`    ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to

`    llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?

The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly

` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.

The GetTarget helper returns a Target reference so there's reason to
convert it to a pointer and check its validity.

Currently, CommandObjects are obtaining a target in a variety of ways.
Often the command incorrectly operates on the selected target. As an
example, when a breakpoint command is running, the current target is
passed into the command but the target that hit the breakpoint is not
the selected target. In other places we use the CommandObject's
execution context, which is frozen during the execution of the command,
and comes with its own limitations. Finally, we often want to fall back
to the dummy target if no real target is available.

Instead of having to guess how to get the target, this patch introduces
one helper function in CommandObject to get the most relevant target. In
order of priority, that's the target from the command object's execution
context, from the interpreter's execution context, the selected target
or the dummy target.

rdar://110846511

[lldb] Part 2 of 2 - Refactor `CommandObject::DoExecute(...)` to return
`void` instead of ~~`bool`~~

Justifications:
- The code doesn't ultimately apply the `true`/`false` return values.
- The methods already pass around a `CommandReturnObject`, typically
with a `result` parameter.
- Each command return object already contains:
	- A more precise status
	- The error code(s) that apply to that status

Part 1 refactors the `CommandObject::Execute(...)` method.
- See
[https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69989](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69989)

rdar://117378957

This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896, split into
several parts as it touches a lot of files.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141298