The majority of the replaced Target pointers were already used
unconditionally and the few that were shouldn't even be NULL.

LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743

Summary: This removes most of unnecessary includes in the `source/Commands` directory. This was generated by IWYU and a script that fixed all the bogus reports from IWYU. Patch is tested on Linux and macOS.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: krytarowski, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71489

These files had a lot of whitespace errors in them which was a
constant source of merge conflicts downstream.

A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.

Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.

I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508

llvm-svn: 358135

to reflect the new license.

We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.

Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.

llvm-svn: 351636

This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.

llvm-svn: 346626

When introduced, breakpoint names were just tags that you could
apply to breakpoints that would allow you to refer to a breakpoint
when you couldn't capture the ID, or to refer to a collection of
breakpoints.  

This change makes the names independent holders of breakpoint options
that you can then apply to breakpoints when you add the name to the
breakpoint.  It adds the "breakpoint name configure" command to set
up or reconfigure breakpoint names.  There is also full support for
then in the SB API, including a new SBBreakpointName class.

The connection between the name and the breakpoints
sharing the name remains live, so if you reconfigure the name, all the
breakpoint options all change as well.  This allows a quick way
to share complex breakpoint behavior among a bunch of breakpoints, and
a convenient way to iterate on the set.

You can also create a name from a breakpoint, allowing a quick way
to copy options from one breakpoint to another.

I also added the ability to make hidden and delete/disable protected
names.  When applied to a breakpoint, you will only be able to list,
delete or disable that breakpoint if you refer to it explicitly by ID.

This feature will allow GUI's that need to use breakpoints for their
own purposes to keep their breakpoints from getting accidentally 
disabled or deleted.

<rdar://problem/22094452>

llvm-svn: 313292

*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style.  This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:

Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort.  Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit.  The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):

    find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
    find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;

The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.

Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit.  There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit.  YMMV.

llvm-svn: 280751