The LLVM Style Guide says the following about error and warning messages
[1]:

> [T]o match error message styles commonly produced by other tools,
> start the first sentence with a lowercase letter, and finish the last
> sentence without a period, if it would end in one otherwise.

I often provide this feedback during code review, but we still have a
bunch of places where we have inconsistent error message, which bothers
me as a user. This PR identifies a handful of those places and updates
the messages to be consistent.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#error-and-warning-messages

LLDB breakpoint conditions take an expression that's evaluated using the
language of the code where the breakpoint is located. Users have asked
to have an option to tell it to evaluate the expression in a specific
language.

This is feature is especially helpful for Swift, for example for a
condition based on the value in memory at an offset from a register.
Such a condition is pretty difficult to write in Swift, but easy in C.

This PR adds a new argument (-Y) to specify the language of the
condition expression. We can't reuse the current -L option, since you
might want to break on only Swift symbols, but run a C expression there
as per the example above.

rdar://146119507

This RP changes some Breakpoint-related interfaces to return errors. On
its own these improvements are small, but they encourage better error
handling going forward. There are a bunch of other candidates, but these
were the functions that I touched while working on #146602.

It was assuming that for any location M.N, N was always less than the
number of breakpoint locations. But if you rebuild the target and rerun
multiple times, when the section backing one of the locations is no
longer valid, we remove the location, but we don't reuse the ID. So you
can have a breakpoint that only has location 1.3. The num_locations
check would say that was an invalid location.

Note that CommandArgumentEntry is an alias for:

  std::vector<CommandArgumentData>

…ror() [NFC]

To support detecting MD5 checksum mismatches, deal with SupportFiles
rather than a plain FileSpecs in the SourceManager.

The majority of the replaced Target pointers were already used
unconditionally and the few that were shouldn't even be NULL.

Currently, CommandObjects are obtaining a target in a variety of ways.
Often the command incorrectly operates on the selected target. As an
example, when a breakpoint command is running, the current target is
passed into the command but the target that hit the breakpoint is not
the selected target. In other places we use the CommandObject's
execution context, which is frozen during the execution of the command,
and comes with its own limitations. Finally, we often want to fall back
to the dummy target if no real target is available.

Instead of having to guess how to get the target, this patch introduces
one helper function in CommandObject to get the most relevant target. In
order of priority, that's the target from the command object's execution
context, from the interpreter's execution context, the selected target
or the dummy target.

rdar://110846511

As a minor follow up for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97675, I'm renaming `SupportsExceptionBreakpoints` to `SupportsExceptionBreakpointsOnThrow` and adding a `SupportsExceptionBreakpointsOnCatch` to have a bit of more granularity.