This reverts commit c861fe8a71e64f3d2108c58147e7375cd9314521.

Unfortunately, this use of hidden visibility attributes causes
user-defined specializations of standard-library types to also be marked
hidden by default, which is incorrect. See discussion thread on #131156.

...and also reverts the follow-up commits:

Revert "[libc++] Add explicit ABI annotations to functions from the block runtime declared in <__functional/function.h> (#140592)"
This reverts commit 3e4c9dc299c35155934688184319d391b298fff7.

Revert "[libc++] Make ABI annotations explicit for windows-specific code (#140507)"
This reverts commit f73287e623a6c2e4a3485832bc3e10860cd26eb5.

Revert "[libc++][NFC] Replace a few "namespace std" with the correct macro (#140510)"
This reverts commit 1d411f27c769a32cb22ce50b9dc4421e34fd40dd.

This patch introduces `_LIBCPP_{BEGIN,END}_EXPLICIT_ABI_ANNOTATIONS`,
which allow us to have implicit annotations for most functions, and just
where it's not "hide_from_abi everything" we add explicit annotations.
This allows us to drop the `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` macro from most
functions in libc++.

Holding the associated lock while calling notify_* on a
condition_variable is generally considered a pessimization, as the
notified thread might "instantly" wake up, notice that it can't acquire
the lock, and then goes back to sleep.

Source files in libc++ are added to the CMake targets only if they are
required by the configuration. We do this pretty consistently for all
configurations like no-filesystem, no-random-device, etc. but we didn't
do it for no-threads. This patch makes this consistent for no-threads,
which is helpful in reducing the amount of work required to port libc++
to some platforms without threads.

Indeed, with the previous approach, several threads-related source files
would end up including headers that might fail to compile properly on
some platforms. This issue is sidestepped entirely by making the
approach for no-threads consistent with the other configurations.

I am about to touch several lines in that file for a patch anyway, so
I might as well clang-format it upfront to avoid mixing styles after
my patch.

This also updates the moved code to the current style. (i.e. `_VSTD` -> `std`, `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` -> `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`, clang-format).

Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc, EricWF

Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits, mikhail.ramalho

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146228

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Spies: aheejin, sstefan1, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129386

Our best guess is that the two syntaxes should have exactly equivalent
effects, so, let's be consistent with what we do in libcxx/include/.

I've left `#include "include/x.h"` and `#include "../y.h"` alone
because I'm less sure that they're interchangeable, and they aren't
inconsistent with libcxx/include/ because libcxx/include/ never
does that kind of thing.

Also, use the `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS/POP_MACROS` dance for `<__undef_macros>`,
even though it's technically unnecessary in a standalone .cpp file,
just so we have consistently one way to do it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119561

We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.

This is a followup to 35bc5276ca3.  It fixes the dependent libs usage
in libcxx and libcxxabi to link pthread and rt libraries only if CMake
detects them, rather than based on explicit platform blacklist.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70888