llvm-project.git/libc/test/src/complex/crealf128_test.cpp, branch users/nico/python-2 Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository. [libc][complex] add cfloat16 and cfloat128 compiler flags (#121140) 2024-12-26T07:20:07+00:00 Shourya Goel shouryagoel10000@gmail.com 2024-12-26T07:20:07+00:00 abd91023447d146f36357326fc97c458b49e40af Proper fix for the temporary fix in #114696 
Proper fix for the temporary fix in #114696
 [libc][complex] implement different flavors of `creal` and `cimag` functions (#113300) 2024-11-03T04:08:09+00:00 Shourya Goel shouryagoel10000@gmail.com 2024-11-03T04:08:09+00:00 ffe04e0351203524b212f850b48edf54dc5dbeb5 I have commented out the test for `neg_zero`(creal) because : 1. real(neg_zero + 0.0i) equals zero. 2. real(neg_zero - 0.0i) equals neg_zero. I am not sure if this is the intended behaviour. [EDIT] I have updated tests for `neg_zero` (creal) to be : ``` EXPECT_FP_EQ(func(CFPT(neg_zero - zero * 1.0i)), neg_zero); EXPECT_FP_EQ(func(CFPT(neg_zero + zero * 1.0i)), zero); ``` because all three [gcc, clang and GNU MPC] also give the same result. https://godbolt.org/z/hxhcn6aof and it seems that it is indeed the correct behaviour since Imaginary types are not supported yet, refer #113671 
I have commented out the test for `neg_zero`(creal) because : 

1. real(neg_zero + 0.0i) equals zero. 
2. real(neg_zero - 0.0i) equals neg_zero.

I am not sure if this is the intended behaviour. 

[EDIT]
I have updated tests for `neg_zero` (creal) to be : 

```
    EXPECT_FP_EQ(func(CFPT(neg_zero - zero * 1.0i)), neg_zero);
    EXPECT_FP_EQ(func(CFPT(neg_zero + zero * 1.0i)), zero);
```

because all three [gcc, clang and GNU MPC] also give the same result. 
https://godbolt.org/z/hxhcn6aof
and it seems that it is indeed the correct behaviour since Imaginary
types are not supported yet, refer #113671