'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files

The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.

The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.

Original message:

This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:

- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
  by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
  value.

rdar://10184173

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484

llvm-svn: 309386

The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.

> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
>   by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
>   value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484

llvm-svn: 309186

'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files

The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.

Original message:

This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:

- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
  by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
  value.

rdar://10184173

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484

llvm-svn: 309106

This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.

> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
>   by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
>   value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484

llvm-svn: 308455

and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files

This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:

- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
  by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
  value.

rdar://10184173

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484

llvm-svn: 308441

I forgot to test clang-tools-extra which is now failing.

llvm-svn: 308328

of '#pragma pack' in included files

This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:

- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
  by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
  value.

rdar://10184173

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484

llvm-svn: 308327

llvm-svn: 166280

llvm-svn: 165810