Add nuw attribute to inbounds GEPs where the expression used to form the
GEP is an addition of unsigned indices.

Relands #105496, which was reverted because it exposed a miscompilation
arising from #98608. This is now fixed by #106512.

Reverts llvm/llvm-project#105496

This patch breaks:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/25/builds/1952
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/1775

Somehow output is different with sanitizers.
Maybe non-determinism in the code?

Add nuw attribute to inbounds GEPs where the expression used to form the
GEP is an addition of unsigned indices.

Generate nuw GEPs for struct member accesses, as inbounds + non-negative
implies nuw.

Regression tests are updated using update scripts where possible, and by
find + replace where not.

Conversion performed using the script at:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only tests where no manual fixup was required.

This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.

The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115

Changed the we handle llvm::Constants in sizes arrays. ConstExprs and
GlobalValues cannot be used as initializers, need to put them at the
runtime, otherwise there wight be the compilation errors.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105297

This reverts commit 638938117aeae5518d6cacd066ffd9830ef4fc9a. Need to
fix reported fail https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/193/builds/7496

Changed the we handle llvm::Constants in sizes arrays. ConstExprs and
GlobalValues cannot be used as initializers, need to put them at the
runtime, otherwise there wight be the compilation errors.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105297

OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM flag is used to mark the data that shoud be passed
as arguments to the target kernels, nothing else. But the compiler still
marks the data with OMP_MAP_TARGET_PARAM flags even if the data is
passed to the data movement directives, like target data, target update
etc. This flag is just ignored for this directives and the compiler does
not need to emit it.

Reviewed By: cchen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91261