These aren't AVX512VL tests
Resolves #161337
Allowing VPERMILPD/S intrinsics to be used in constexpr Closes #167878
Fixes #167681
'target' is not one of the features recognized by clang tests, and the test doesn't require X86 backend to be built. Specify the target explicitly instead. Remove duplicate `-fsanitize=type` as well.
…nd update docs
Enables constexpr evaluation for the following AVX512 Instrinsics: ``` _mm_movepi8_mask _mm256_movepi8_mask _mm512_movepi8_mask _mm_movepi16_mask _mm256_movepi16_mask _mm512_movepi16_mask _mm_movepi32_mask _mm256_movepi32_mask _mm512_movepi32_mask _mm_movepi64_mask _mm256_movepi64_mask _mm512_movepi64_mask ``` Part of #162072
The clang side of the calling convention code for arm64 vs. arm64ec is close enough that this isn't really noticeable in most cases, but the rule for choosing whether to pass a struct directly or indirectly is significantly different. (Adapted from my old patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D125419 .) Fixes #89615.
- Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/166512 - `ComplexExprEmitter::EmitCompoundAssignLValue` is calling `EmitLoadOfScalar(LValue, SourceLocation)` to load the LHS value in the case that it's non-complex, however this function requires that the value is a simple LValue - issue occurred because the LValue in question was a bitfield LValue. I changed it to use this function which seems to handle all of the different cases (deferring to the original `EmitLoadOfScalar` if it's a simple LValue)