<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>llvm-project.git/clang/test/CodeGen/exprs.c, branch users/nico/python-2</title>
<subtitle>Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>[Clang] [NFC] Fix unintended `-Wreturn-type` warnings everywhere in the test suite (#123464)</title>
<updated>2025-01-18T18:16:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Sirraide</name>
<email>aeternalmail@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2025-01-18T18:16:33+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=12f78e740c5419f7d1fbcf8f2106e7a40cd1d6f7'/>
<id>12f78e740c5419f7d1fbcf8f2106e7a40cd1d6f7</id>
<content type='text'>
In preparation of making `-Wreturn-type` default to an error (as there
is virtually no situation where you’d *want* to fall off the end of a
function that is supposed to return a value), this patch fixes tests
that have relied on this being only a warning, of which there seem 
to be 3 kinds:

1. Tests which for no apparent reason have a function that triggers the
warning.

I suspect that a lot of these were on accident (or from before the
warning was introduced), since a lot of people will open issues w/ their
problematic code in the `main` function (which is the one case where you
don’t need to return from a non-void function, after all...), which
someone will then copy, possibly into a namespace, possibly renaming it,
the end result of that being that you end up w/ something that
definitely is not `main` anymore, but which still is declared as
returning `int`, and which still has no return statement (another reason
why I think this might apply to a lot of these is because usually the
actual return type of such problematic functions is quite literally
`int`).
  
A lot of these are really old tests that don’t use `-verify`, which is
why no-one noticed or had to care about the extra warning that was
already being emitted by them until now.

2. Tests which test either `-Wreturn-type`, `[[noreturn]]`, or what
codegen and sanitisers do whenever you do fall off the end of a
function.

3. Tests where I struggle to figure out what is even being tested
(usually because they’re Objective-C tests, and I don’t know
Objective-C), whether falling off the end of a function matters in the
first place, and tests where actually spelling out an expression to
return would be rather cumbersome (e.g. matrix types currently don’t
support list initialisation, so I can’t write e.g. `return {}`).

For tests that fall into categories 2 and 3, I just added
`-Wno-error=return-type` to the `RUN` lines and called it a day. This
was especially necessary for the former since `-Wreturn-type` is an
analysis-based warning, meaning that it is currently impossible to test
for more than one occurrence of it in the same compilation if it
defaults to an error since the analysis pass is skipped for subsequent
functions as soon as an error is emitted.

I’ve also added `-Werror=return-type` to a few tests that I had already
updated as this patch was previously already making the warning an error
by default, but we’ve decided to split that into two patches instead.</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
In preparation of making `-Wreturn-type` default to an error (as there
is virtually no situation where you’d *want* to fall off the end of a
function that is supposed to return a value), this patch fixes tests
that have relied on this being only a warning, of which there seem 
to be 3 kinds:

1. Tests which for no apparent reason have a function that triggers the
warning.

I suspect that a lot of these were on accident (or from before the
warning was introduced), since a lot of people will open issues w/ their
problematic code in the `main` function (which is the one case where you
don’t need to return from a non-void function, after all...), which
someone will then copy, possibly into a namespace, possibly renaming it,
the end result of that being that you end up w/ something that
definitely is not `main` anymore, but which still is declared as
returning `int`, and which still has no return statement (another reason
why I think this might apply to a lot of these is because usually the
actual return type of such problematic functions is quite literally
`int`).
  
A lot of these are really old tests that don’t use `-verify`, which is
why no-one noticed or had to care about the extra warning that was
already being emitted by them until now.

2. Tests which test either `-Wreturn-type`, `[[noreturn]]`, or what
codegen and sanitisers do whenever you do fall off the end of a
function.

3. Tests where I struggle to figure out what is even being tested
(usually because they’re Objective-C tests, and I don’t know
Objective-C), whether falling off the end of a function matters in the
first place, and tests where actually spelling out an expression to
return would be rather cumbersome (e.g. matrix types currently don’t
support list initialisation, so I can’t write e.g. `return {}`).

For tests that fall into categories 2 and 3, I just added
`-Wno-error=return-type` to the `RUN` lines and called it a day. This
was especially necessary for the former since `-Wreturn-type` is an
analysis-based warning, meaning that it is currently impossible to test
for more than one occurrence of it in the same compilation if it
defaults to an error since the analysis pass is skipped for subsequent
functions as soon as an error is emitted.

I’ve also added `-Werror=return-type` to a few tests that I had already
updated as this patch was previously already making the warning an error
by default, but we’ve decided to split that into two patches instead.</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[clang] Remove rdar links; NFC</title>
<updated>2023-08-28T16:13:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aaron Ballman</name>
<email>aaron@aaronballman.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-08-28T16:13:42+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=0f1c1be1968076d6f96f8a7bcc4a15cf195ecd97'/>
<id>0f1c1be1968076d6f96f8a7bcc4a15cf195ecd97</id>
<content type='text'>
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.

This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.

This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "Remove rdar links; NFC"</title>
<updated>2023-07-18T01:08:04+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Mehdi Amini</name>
<email>joker.eph@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-17T19:47:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=e0ac46e69d7adbe327148550ffafe746cbc0ec78'/>
<id>e0ac46e69d7adbe327148550ffafe746cbc0ec78</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d.
This commit wasn't reviewed ahead of time and significant concerns were
raised immediately after it landed. According to our developer policy
this warrants immediate revert of the commit.

https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155509
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d.
This commit wasn't reviewed ahead of time and significant concerns were
raised immediately after it landed. According to our developer policy
this warrants immediate revert of the commit.

https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155509
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Remove rdar links; NFC</title>
<updated>2023-07-07T12:41:11+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aaron Ballman</name>
<email>aaron@aaronballman.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-07T12:38:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d'/>
<id>d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d</id>
<content type='text'>
This removes links to rdar, which is an internal bug tracker that the
community doesn't have visibility into.

See further discussion at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/code-review-reminder-about-links-in-code-commit-messages/71847
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This removes links to rdar, which is an internal bug tracker that the
community doesn't have visibility into.

See further discussion at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/code-review-reminder-about-links-in-code-commit-messages/71847
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[CodeGen] Convert tests to opaque pointers (NFC)</title>
<updated>2022-10-07T12:22:00+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Nikita Popov</name>
<email>npopov@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-10-07T12:09:44+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=39db5e1ed87363a9ffea81e53520b542201b3262'/>
<id>39db5e1ed87363a9ffea81e53520b542201b3262</id>
<content type='text'>
Conversion performed using the script at:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only tests where no manual fixup was required.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Conversion performed using the script at:
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34

These are only tests where no manual fixup was required.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[OpaquePtrs][Clang] Add -no-opaque-pointers to tests (NFC)</title>
<updated>2022-04-07T10:09:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Nikita Popov</name>
<email>npopov@redhat.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-04-07T10:03:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=532dc62b907554b3f07f17205674aa71e76fc863'/>
<id>532dc62b907554b3f07f17205674aa71e76fc863</id>
<content type='text'>
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.

The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This adds -no-opaque-pointers to clang tests whose output will
change when opaque pointers are enabled by default. This is
intended to be part of the migration approach described in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/enabling-opaque-pointers-by-default/61322/9.

The patch has been produced by replacing %clang_cc1 with
%clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers for tests that fail with opaque
pointers enabled. Worth noting that this doesn't cover all tests,
there's a remaining ~40 tests not using %clang_cc1 that will need
a followup change.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123115
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Add -Wno-strict-prototypes to C tests; NFC</title>
<updated>2022-02-24T20:30:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aaron Ballman</name>
<email>aaron@aaronballman.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-24T20:30:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=2ceee2f8843f31fb6dab9f133e9b248b2eaa713a'/>
<id>2ceee2f8843f31fb6dab9f133e9b248b2eaa713a</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch adds -Wno-strict-prototypes to all of the test cases that
use functions without prototypes, but not as the primary concern of the
test. e.g., attributes testing whether they can/cannot be applied to a
function without a prototype, etc.

This is done in preparation for enabling -Wstrict-prototypes by
default.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This patch adds -Wno-strict-prototypes to all of the test cases that
use functions without prototypes, but not as the primary concern of the
test. e.g., attributes testing whether they can/cannot be applied to a
function without a prototype, etc.

This is done in preparation for enabling -Wstrict-prototypes by
default.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Use functions with prototypes when appropriate; NFC</title>
<updated>2022-02-15T21:06:43+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Aaron Ballman</name>
<email>aaron@aaronballman.com</email>
</author>
<published>2022-02-15T21:06:01+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=adc402bf3d0565ac2bc7efbdd05f0d846e818041'/>
<id>adc402bf3d0565ac2bc7efbdd05f0d846e818041</id>
<content type='text'>
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&amp;R C
declarations. e.g.,

  void func();

becomes

  void func(void);

This is the eleventh batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&amp;R C
declarations. e.g.,

  void func();

becomes

  void func(void);

This is the eleventh batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>[test] Add {{.*}} to make ELF tests immune to dso_local/dso_preemptable/(none) differences</title>
<updated>2020-12-31T08:27:11+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Fangrui Song</name>
<email>i@maskray.me</email>
</author>
<published>2020-12-31T08:27:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=fd739804e0591468762eb87488a497a3f7d4afb0'/>
<id>fd739804e0591468762eb87488a497a3f7d4afb0</id>
<content type='text'>
For a default visibility external linkage definition, dso_local is set for ELF
-fno-pic/-fpie and COFF and Mach-O. Since default clang -cc1 for ELF is similar
to -fpic ("PIC Level" is not set), this nuance causes unneeded binary format differences.

To make emitted IR similar, ELF -cc1 -fpic will default to -fno-semantic-interposition,
which sets dso_local for default visibility external linkage definitions.

To make this flip smooth and enable future (dso_local as definition default),
this patch replaces (function) `define ` with `define{{.*}} `,
(variable/constant/alias) `= ` with `={{.*}} `, or inserts appropriate `{{.*}} `.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
For a default visibility external linkage definition, dso_local is set for ELF
-fno-pic/-fpie and COFF and Mach-O. Since default clang -cc1 for ELF is similar
to -fpic ("PIC Level" is not set), this nuance causes unneeded binary format differences.

To make emitted IR similar, ELF -cc1 -fpic will default to -fno-semantic-interposition,
which sets dso_local for default visibility external linkage definitions.

To make this flip smooth and enable future (dso_local as definition default),
this patch replaces (function) `define ` with `define{{.*}} `,
(variable/constant/alias) `= ` with `={{.*}} `, or inserts appropriate `{{.*}} `.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Revert "[CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition"</title>
<updated>2020-02-03T18:09:39+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Fangrui Song</name>
<email>maskray@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-02-03T18:09:39+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.belthelziquor.com/llvm-project.git/commit/?id=dbc96b518b619d37aacf670e1a9d3b90b5614dd2'/>
<id>dbc96b518b619d37aacf670e1a9d3b90b5614dd2</id>
<content type='text'>
This reverts commit 789a46f2d742e11edaade28cb59a0f4d2a1d770e.

Accidentally committed.
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
This reverts commit 789a46f2d742e11edaade28cb59a0f4d2a1d770e.

Accidentally committed.
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
