Allow direct dispatch for the ObjFW runtime

Follow-up to #123569

The layout and the size of an ObjC interface can change after its
corresponding implementation is parsed when synthesized ivars or ivars
declared in categories are added to the interface's list of ivars. This
can cause clang to mis-compile if the optimization that emits fixed
offsets for ivars (see 923ddf65f4e21ec67018cf56e823895de18d83bc) uses an
ObjC class layout that is outdated and no longer reflects the current
state of the class.

For example, when compiling `constant-non-fragile-ivar-offset.m`, clang
emits 20 instead of 24 as the offset for `IntermediateClass2Property` as
the class layout for `SuperClass2`, which is created when the
implementation of IntermediateClass3 is parsed, is outdated when the
implementation of `IntermediateClass2` is parsed.

This commit invalidates the stale layout information of the class and
its subclasses if new ivars are added to the interface.

With this change, we can also stop using ObjC implementation decls as
the key to retrieve ObjC class layouts information as the layout
retrieved using the ObjC interface as the key will always be up to date.

rdar://139531391

This PR removes the old `nocapture` attribute, replacing it with the new
`captures` attribute introduced in #116990. This change is
intended to be essentially NFC, replacing existing uses of `nocapture`
with `captures(none)` without adding any new analysis capabilities.
Making use of non-`none` values is left for a followup.

Some notes:
* `nocapture` will be upgraded to `captures(none)` by the bitcode
   reader.
* `nocapture` will also be upgraded by the textual IR reader. This is to
   make it easier to use old IR files and somewhat reduce the test churn in
   this PR.
* Helper APIs like `doesNotCapture()` will check for `captures(none)`.
* MLIR import will convert `captures(none)` into an `llvm.nocapture`
   attribute. The representation in the LLVM IR dialect should be updated
   separately.

Identified with misc-include-cleaner.

It is simple to create the struct body up front, now that we have
transitioned to opaque pointers.

Follow up to #109133.